User talk:Nihoyari

Nihoyari, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nihoyari! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, 2017 page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

original research

stop using director names with your original research, and stop using [[ ]] without establishing notability Gridhalur (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

shorgul

kindly stop your unclear and disruptive IP edits. Gridhalur (talk) 09:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bihar topper scam 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaishali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nihoyari, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Bihar topper scam 2016 has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Sonpur community development block) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sonpur community development block, Nihoyari!

Wikipedia editor Mooseandbruce1 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your contribution!

To reply, leave a comment on Mooseandbruce1's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Adi Shankara

@Nihoyari: Please don't edit war on Adi Shankara page. The sources you are citing are not mainstream scholarship and WP:RS, and the content you are adding is not WP:Due. Per WP:BRD guideline, discuss and gain consensus on the article's talk page. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Hello

I see you want to contribute to Wikipedia. You are free to do so and Wikipedia community will be happy to receive your help. But you will have to follow certain rules and guidelines. Make sure you read the section Welcome and it's links in the above part of this page for more information. If having any doubt, feel free to contact me at my talk page. Pratyush (talk) 08:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

External links on Hina Khan

Please do not add unnecessary external links in Wikipedia. Please read WP:ELNO for details. Zafar24Talk 17:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of B.K.Bansal

Hello Nihoyari,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged B.K.Bansal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mindcap (talk) 17:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from B.K.Bansal, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Mindcap (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources for history

Hi, I noticed that your recent edits to Akbar source information from websites such as scroll.in and dailyo.in. Please note that such sites are not considered reliable sources for history articles. For more on this, please familiarise yourself with WP:HISTRS, and the relevant sections within WP:RS. Thanks.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 19:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nihoyari. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Defamatory sources

Hi Nihoyari. You probably mean well, but two of your recent edits, this and this show the same pattern. When adding a source for a simple undisputed fact, you add a source for a completely different issue, one which is defamatory in nature and not discussed at all. I assume in good faithe that wanted to discuss the new facts - if you think the facts are important, discuss them and add a source. If you just wanted to source the undisputed facts, add a factual source for them. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Redundant references

Please don't add redundant references like [1] or [2] -- the content is already sourced. In this case, you added a link to a book excerpt from the book that was already cited as a source (Jha & Jha, 2012).

This creates unnecessary ref clutter. If you're adding some new content, or if the existing content is unsourced, it makes sense to add references. utcursch | talk 03:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

And, on Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, you have added a blog. Never do that please! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

English cricket team in India in 2016–17

Hi. A couple of editors have now reverted your changes to this article. Per WP:BRD, you'll need to raise your suggestion on the talkpage to get further input. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 14:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

You are now edit warring. This map has been removed by two different editors. Please discuss this on the article's talkpage. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 14:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bharatvarsh (TV series)

The article Bharatvarsh (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV, tagged for notability since 2016

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)