User talk:Nign0g1

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Black Jews, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 09:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man

Information needs to be proven for inclusion, not for exclusion. Please see the talk page for discussion on the matter. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I meant by discussion. Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not truth. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Funnyordie1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Funnyordie1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hulk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hulk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hulk2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hulk2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hydrogen Iodide 06:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man edit

I have reverted your edit. First, please review how to make a ref tag. the slash / to close it goes before the ref, not after. second, the article actually confirms something already reported, that Favreau himself appears as a security guard. this was revealed by other, independent sources last week, and is already in the article. Jackson and Swank are NOT true. sorry. Thanks for trying and I do recognize your edit as Good faith. ThuranX 04:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Incredible Hulk

Hi, please note that the article says that Emil Blonsky will not be identified as Abomination in the film. Also, the reference that cites Tim Blake Nelson in the film does not say that Samuel Sterns will become The Leader, merely identifying him as a scientist. There's no telling how filmmakers will interpret Samuel Sterns, so in the meantime, we need to stick with what we know for sure. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Wilson

Yo. Please don't add silly stuff to wikipedia like you did to Owen Wilson. It just gets reverted anyway. Cheers, Rothery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rothery (talk • contribs) 08:41, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paris Hilton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acalamari 18:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Eric the Midget has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- pb30<talk> 13:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1) Please do not edit my user page. 2) Until a trade is complete - a player is not a member of the new team. Do not change the teams until all aspects of the trade (contract negotiations AND physicals) are complete. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 23:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:JustSomeRandomGuy32, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 23:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block (indefinite - username)

This account has been blocked under the terms of Wikipedia:Username (policy), as it contains a racist term considered offensive. Please read the policy and feel free to choose a new, appropriate username. Thanks, Deiz talk 11:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted, however, that your editing to date has been problematic. Choosing a new name will not "wipe the slate clean" - it will be easy to associate the new name with the dispruptive edits you have already made, and you may be blocked for future problems. Please take this opportunity to relax, familiarize yourself with WP policies and practices, and decide whether you wish to be a civil, productive member of the community or whether your time might be more appropriately spent pursuing other interests. Thanks again, Deiz talk 11:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]