User talk:NightWolf1223/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

• News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments

• In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan

• News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond

• Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise

• From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes

• Essay: Wikipedia:The Free Encyclopedia

• Obituary: Yoninah

• From the editor: What else can we say?

• Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees

• Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit of

You left me a message because you restored edits I made to a page about Denis Baylor. I would like to edit that page. I did not intend to remove the text box but I did intend to make changes to the text of the article to correct factual errors and include more precise descriptions of his science. I plan to make a number of improvements to this page. Can you please explain what would be an adequate descriptions so that next time these changes are not removed? Thank you Elizabee920. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabee920 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
159		Anne-Marie Trevelyan (talk)	Add sources
39		Irene Rich (talk)	Add sources
103		Greg Hands (talk)	Add sources
118		Brexit negotiations (talk)	Add sources
1,523		Politics of the United Kingdom (talk)	Add sources
1,177		Arlene Foster (talk)	Add sources
141		Exercise Cygnus (talk)	Cleanup
331		Alexander Nix (talk)	Cleanup
5,878		Iraq War (talk)	Cleanup
1,154		Environmental issues (talk)	Expand
1,722		Second impeachment of Donald Trump (talk)	Expand
174		Brandon Lewis (talk)	Expand
120		Mahdavia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
111		Will Kymlicka (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
72		United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
35		Means-tested benefit (talk)	Merge
18		Fish for finance (talk)	Merge
1,080		Opinion polling for the 2021 Senedd election (talk)	Merge
14		Anne Kristen (talk)	Wikify
122		Darren Jones (politician) (talk)	Wikify
137		Spain–United Kingdom relations (talk)	Wikify
4		Social security in the Republic of Ireland (talk)	Orphan
2		Learning and skills in England (talk)	Orphan
5		MyCarCheck (talk)	Orphan
172		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
25		Susan Acland-Hood (talk)	Stub
7		Slovakia–United Kingdom relations (talk)	Stub
5		Lucius Duccius Rufinus (talk)	Stub
78		The Party that Teaches How to Not Pay the NHK License Fee (talk)	Stub
4		Mexborough First (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:54, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Constructive dialogue

Yes I was a bit prickly. But I ask you this, did either of you once attempt to engage in discussion? Did you investigate a single diff before rummaging through twinkle's options? Did you pause to consider that had you wielded those tools against someone less experience than myself the mess might have never gotten sorted, and someone might be wrongfully blocked? I note you have yet to strike your obviously false accusation on my talk page, which by the way is a WP:PA. My first attempt to engage was perfectly polite and it was removed using a semi-automated tool without an edit summary. I was *this close* to taking both of you to WP:ANI, and that's from someone who believes the title of that board should be moved to WP:CESSPIT. I still can't fathom why you wouldn't even try to discuss things so yes maybe I could word this more nicely but sometimes it's better not to mince words and tell someone directly that they've goofed big, particularly in a more private setting. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 23:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

It looks like your away, which is fine I guess I'm going away for a long while, and even if we cross paths again chance are we won't recognize each other, I won't be at this IP address, and named accounts come and go so often I've long since lost my ability to keep track of them. So I owe you an apology, you're still new, and yes I was a bit bitey not the best foot to get started off-on to be sure. I guess the key point is that accuracy is more important than speed when doing WP:RCP and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, you should assume everyone is here to contribute constructively regardless of whether or not someone they have chosen to put a name in front of their IP address. Even so, you are going to make mistakes. I’ve made bad reverts before, and will do so again in the future, the sheer volume involved in RCP will ensure your never completely mistake free. The key is to make as few as practical, resist the overwhelming urge to revert as quickly as possible, and to be prepared to admit you've made mistakes when somebody points it out, strike through incorrect warnings and self-revert with grace.

None of this was a big deal, I long ago lost track of the number of times I’ve been spuriously reported to AIV. And it was never my intent to make you feel bad about yourself. We’re all here trying to build an encyclopedia, even if sometimes we pull in different directions, and I sincerely wish you all the best in your future endeavors. Cheers, 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 23:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Congratulations for becoming one of the first few PCRs who joined in 2021! Cupper52 (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)