User talk:Night-changer

Welcome!

Hello, Night-changer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sources, I do enjoy editing here. I'll be glad to meet a few of the folks if any event will occur in Tel aviv Night-changer (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site guidelines and policies you may find useful

Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments.
Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, additions to talk pages should be about improving the article within the guidelines, not voicing one's opinion on the subject matter.
"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). -- Note that we never cite Wiktionary, and prefer to cite academic works instead of dictionaries.
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

Ian.thomson (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pedophilia article

Hello, Night-changer. I reverted you at the Pedophilia article for reasons stated here and here. If you want to comment on your additions and my revert, you should do so by starting a new a section at Talk:Pedophilia. Flyer22 (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that we do use dictionary definitions to approach the way that the term pedophilia is used in common speech and in dictionaries, but that is lower in the WP:Lead, not for the first sentence or a paragraph that is solely about the medical aspect of the term. Flyer22 (talk) 15:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Computer Security user status

Hello Night-changer,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 22:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]