User talk:NigelR/Archive1

This is an archive of my talk page from the start to August 2006. Leave new messages at my talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, NigelR/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 04:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nigel, that's a "boilerplate welcome" above, but I wanted to compliment you for taking the time to revert the external links you had asked about at the Help Desk. You were Bold! I tend to keep several articles on my watchlist which seem to attract commercial links from Anon IPs fairly often. Reverting spamlinks isn't very glamorous, but it helps to maintain the credibility of WP as a whole. Thanks! --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 04:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biscay

Nigel - thanks for the message - I have just got back from a journey to the Bay of Biscay myself so I was inspired to write about it. I am fairly new myself on Wikipedia (certainly no expert!)

Tony

forcrudate

please visit my page and tell me what you think of my favorite word. P.S. I noticed you erased what I did on the butt sex page. lol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.170 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 9 Aug 2006 (UTC)

National parks

Those links you mentioned on the help desk are commercial spam. Please, feel free to remove them. If you feel uncomfortable doing it yourself, please let me know the article titles (and link title) and I will do it for you. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can go ahead and revert any link that you left in there. If anyone questions you, just tell them I said it was okay. :) - Mgm|^(talk) 16:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 62.25.109.194 block

Thanks for pointing this particular user out. I agree that 3 hours isn't enough. However, it is a shared-ip address, meaning that other legitimate editors use it, so it will have to do for now. Once again, thanks for helping out in this one, and welcome to Wikipedia. Happy editing. --Jay(Reply) 15:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

geocaching

Not sure why you sound so offended about a small edit that left most of your addition, and just trimmed it a bit. Are you sure you're not confusing me with somebody else? - DavidWBrooks 21:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right: I did remove the entire edit, not just part of it (my error). I put an explanation in the "Edit summary" box when I made the change - did you see that? Geocaching is already a long, cumbersome article, so we want to keep peripheral material to a minimum, and the history of a different pastime (which is available on that pastime's article, of course) doesn't make the cut, it seems to me. - DavidWBrooks 10:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for editing my Talk page and removing those links. I didn't even know they were there, I appreciate it.

Reikon 09:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing my talk page :-) Myanw 12:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's been blocked, I think the day will be good after all - Myanw 13:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I use IE at work (yeah, I do edit wikipedia while I'm supposed to be working, shame on me), I have no choice, I can't install anything on my "computer" there, heck, I can't even fix the delay the clock displays - Myanw 13:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!

Getting a second opinion that agrees is always heartening; you're very welcome. Good spam-hunting to you! — Saxifrage ✎ 20:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Verde Edits

Hi, just contacting you about the cape verde links i added, the website is a non profit site and is just for the english speaking public to gain information about Cape Verde and to chat about it on the forum, it is not a tour operator or anything like that if that what you felt it was. I hope you will see the site for what it is, thank you.

Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.159.184.222 (talk • contribs)

Hi Mark - I'll place this answer on both talk pages in case you miss it. Given what is now on your talk page you will probably understand that it is not just my view that these links constitute spam as far as Wiki is concerned. A problem you have is that while you continue to only add external links from an IP address rather than an account you will be seen as placing spam by almost any editor. If you want to get an account and join Wiki and contribute your knowledge - fine, if you continue to place links they will probably get removed (and you might find you IP address blocked). -- Nigel 07:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark -- Well it isnt spam but lots more content is going on next week and i hope that will be better for wikipedia, but on the other hand is the forum ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.159.184.222 (talk • contribs)

Well thanks you for getting back to me Mark. The question that occurs to me (other than why you don't get an account) is are you interesting in people learning more about the Cape Verde area or in bringing people to your website? I'm sure you have a great deal of knowledge about the area so to get an account and put useful information into the pages concerned would be good. However otherwise any number of editors on Wiki will merely take the links out again - I guess it's your choice. It would be good if you would sign your posts to talk pages to - it is quite simple -

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!

Thanks -- Nigel ^(Talk) 13:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill revert

why did you remove the change i made to the churchill page? is there a way of chatting to you about this website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.9.94.149 (talk • contribs)

Eastern Mediterranean University

I added that the Eastern Mediterranean University is situated in the unrecognized Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, because the readers will assume that the university is situated in the legally recognized Republic of Cyprus. The university itself is also probably unrecognized due to its geography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.255.230.227 (talk • contribs)

I can only state that I did not feel it represented a Neutral point of view. I am sure the clarification could be made in a different way? - Nigel ^(Talk) 13:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A relative?

Hallo Nigel, I'm Dirk Beetstra his sister, Richtje. I heard from Dirk that you once visited a Jan Beetstra in Dokkum. Well, I'm very interested in genealogy especially the Beetstra family. But I don't really know which Jan Beetstra you mean, can you tell me more about him and his family? You can find the emailadress on [1] Thank you! 81.207.121.135 16:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Sorry about that. It wasn't meant for you, obviously. - Gimboid13 09:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regina

What I have added to wikipedia concerning the entry Regina, is completely factual and intended to assist the reader. It is a fact that the city Regina rhymes with "vagina". This is a common mistake for people talking about our city, and the clarification is useful to the reader. Please reinsert my addition. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.84.1.68 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 11 Aug 2006 (UTC)

From User talk:Bakanov, where the same message was placed: Its proper pronunciation in is already listed in IPA - there is no need to add that it rhymes with "vagina". I apologise for warning you for a good-faith edit, but will not undo my action. --Bakanov (talk • contribs) 16:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I saw this and decided to make the issue go away. :) — Saxifrage ✎ 18:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon

I reverted the Amazon disambiguation page to a previous edit. Why did you remove this change? The Amazon is not in Africa! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.71.165.70 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 12 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Re:Block on ZachOnGhb

Hi, there are some types of vandalism (including hate speech) that get less warnings than others. The user did many vandal edits in a short period of time with misleading edit summaries, which pretty much guarantees that (s)he's here for just vandalism. (I saw that you got an answer already, just clarifying the signs). - Bobet 12:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits today

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 70.48.251.229 12:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- 70.48.251.229 12:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- the above are souvenirs!

Edward Heath reverts

Perhaps you could look at the Heath discussion page - nicknames - I do not think that minority abusive views have a place on wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.67.146.31 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 12 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Responded to talk page - N

brisbane grammar school

your unexplained actions on the brisbane grammar school article are unjustified, so i reverted them. you must use the discussion page if you are going to accuse me of vandalism, which i am not guilty of. YOU are the one who is more guilty of it than me. --Paaerduag 12:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about overreacting, but some ludicrous edits have been taking place recently that are not yours. I am simply keeping the subheadings as they were before this little display was initiated by 'TheHeadHunter'. --Paaerduag 07:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Panama

No problem :) Cheers --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 18:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

chris

im going to leave a message here. the stuff i was saying on the lesbian page needs to be done. ur all idiots. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.5.91.178 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 14 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Degas

Thank you for deleting the vandalism on the Degas page today. Much appreciated.

JNW 21:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Upturned collar

I was removing vandalism to the upturned collar page. You reversed MY cleanup and called THAT vandalism. I have removed the vandalism again. SEE THE DISCUSSION PAGE. Jeez... 64.219.131.243 17:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi, NigelR/Archive1, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (which will add this user box) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - GIen 16:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MWT

Hi Michael - just tried MWT but I guess I got something wrong as it didn't add me. Apologies and advice welcome (I guess I wanted to see what it was all about) cheers -- Nigel ^(Talk) 07:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by the edit summary here, I'd say you've found a bug. This is the first instance I've seen of this occuring, and my apologies for the programme breaking. I'll do some debugging and see if I can resolve the problem. My current concern is that it allowed you to edit without logging in to wikipedia [2], which means that there are 2 bugs I'll be working on today :P, Thanks for trying it out, even if it didn't work. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 07:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One less bug for you - I did login but maybe not before I tried clicking. I do have this habit of trying things out first and then .... (RTFM is an alien concept to me!). I'm actually at work (wispering) so I may not get to try it much today but I'll hope to over the next couple of days. Is it very tied to IE (if you have time to answer if not fine)? I kinda don't like it <g> and use FF mainly on wiki now (opera isn't as happy/compatible). All the best -- Nigel ^(Talk) 08:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, after a bug report and a discussion on the MWT mailing list (As well as the IRC channel), we've been unable to replicate it, but we've traced it down to a certain subroutine in the programme, which can be avoided using the following method (if you're still interested)

Open up Internet Explorer
Go to Wikipedia
Log in, ticking the "remember me" check box
Close Internet Explorer (finally)
Open MWT, it *should* now add your name to the list, properly now that you can be sure you're logged in. - it should now be working :D

No promise that it will work, but hopefully it will. If it is of interest to you, the bug report can be found here, and as of yet this is the only solution that we can find that does not require editing the programme. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dartmoor

Thanks for your message on my talk page - have a definite interest in Dartmoor (am also originally from South Devon). Will see what I can do. WikiGull

VP 1.3

Absolutely. Head to User:GIen/VP.1.3 and follow the instructions - I'll approve you right now :) - GIen 13:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done!

You're good to go buddy :) - GIen 13:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Link in Aus team

Don't worry about it — your intentions were good! ... discospinster _talk 13:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did have a look at the other articles, and I think I've got them all now. Regards, ... discospinster _talk 13:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple posts?

Even if they point to different pages of a site that has information on different topics? Each link points to anoter page that has information for the topic posted to/for. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spyross (talk • contribs) 17:03, 20 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Understud, thank you! Spyross 17:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New topic / subject?

Well, I am trying to figure out here... how do I create a new page on a topic / subject that is not on wikipedia yet? Spyross 17:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx, I have allot of info I could contribute. I think Ill try adding a new page on a topic I found that is not covered and see what happens :) Spyross 17:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am on the same path (g) Spyross 17:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

And for the reminder to sign! Regarding the welcome template, the talk page link links to User_talk:Username, which is quite odd. Should this be the case? I'm not sure who to ask!

Goodness, forgot to sign again. Hpdw 07:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you sub in your username for the template: Template_talk:Welcome4. Thanks again! Hpdw 07:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit summary

You can find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam.--1568 09:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome:) --1568 09:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sunbury Downs

I think the edits on the Sunbury downs article were a little harsh. I would like some of it to be reviewed again and be put back if possible.

Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chemical Prophet (talk • contribs) 12:18, 21 Aug 2006 (UTC)

RE: Weird one?

Ah, indeed. You must have edited the article a few seconds before I tried to and my program ended up leaving the warning anyways, unbeknownst to me that I hadn't made the initial edit. Cheers! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 12:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, mate! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 12:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Yes, the user's only edits were to add an extlink to a particular site with limited content and relevance. You saved me looking round for that spam template Lozleader 18:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links ...

This's what you said to me :

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Nigel (Talk) 11:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC).

I can't understand, I never added commercial links, but what's wrong with private websites? Searching wikipedia, you can find lots of private websites and even weblogs ! in external links or even at refs ! no matter it's private or anything, the usefulness is important I think. If wiki have a goal to became the best so let make it best by correcting harassing situations together, one thing harassing is that things like Internet, Newspapers, TV channels, etc. have been invented to make people of the world closer to eachother; but! look what's going on! I know wikipedia's law very well but until when these strict laws must make us farther and farther from eachother! for example, all the Americans think that Iranians are zombies !

If... I linked a website, be sure it wasn't for advertising or something like that; Persian beside French is the second-most popular language among bloggers, so I can easily asked 10 of my favourite bloggers to advertise my website and BANG! 1000 vists per day ! seems great ? but this's not what I want, this's not what which should happen. I repeat again, I've never broken any laws; but if you do think that my links may cause any problem so delete them, I won't insisting on them; but never say me my feelings and my way of thinking are incorrect ...

Excuse me for my bad English.

Have a nice time ...

Sassan Sasanjan 20:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Ahvaz ( First 3 links ), or Susa the last link, Masjed Soleiman, Mahshahr, Behbahan ... and other cities of Khouzestan province. Sasanjan 11:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sasanjan (talk • contribs) 11:31, 23 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Well, thank you... All I noticed is that there was a Vandal Edit war going on, and I managed to catch something, well, not so nice. It might be because of your use of Vandal Proof. It's more likely because of you reverting and warning Shabadoo on Al Pacino vandalism. The good guys usually get the short end of the PA stick. Logical2u 10:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: MWT issue query

NigelR wrote:

Hi - just noticed you had the same prob as me. I've not heard anything from Michael & I can't see that you have. If you do (& think of it) I'd be happy to hear anything that may solve it as it does look neat. Regards --Nigel ^(Talk) 15:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The error we're getting is a VB runtime error, which is how pre-.NET versions of Visual Basic deal with untrapped errors. If I had a good look at the source code, I could probably figure out what is causing the error, and modify the code to trap/fix it. I'm a little busy at the moment (as is Michael, presumably), but if I find time, I'll see what I can do. I suspect it may be Internet Explorer-related (I'm assuming it uses the IE WebBrowser control, in which case the pages are rendered using IE regardless of what browser is set as the default) – what version of Internet Explorer do you have? If I do find anything, I'll leave Michael a message, and he can upload a new version – Gurch 16:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. IE is 6.0.2800.xpsp2 tho I don't recall looking at that (or it) in ages. Opera for me was good but using wiki more Firefox becomes choice. If any other info helps or I can test anything let me know (I do tend to have as much switched off/uninstalled as I can!). Regards --Nigel ^(Talk) 17:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, in that case it may be something else. I have the beta version of IE7 installed (though I use Firefox normally), which I thought may have broken something. But since you have the same problem, that's evidently not it. We're both using Windows XP Pro, but I can't think of any reason why that should affect MWT. I shall have a look at the source anyway – Gurch 19:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adorno & Yoss

Thanks for the heads-up. FYI the notice the original creator kept deleting was for a proposed deletion not an AfD, and there's nothing technically wrong with removing one of them. Anyone, even the article creator, can remove a prod... but if the creator keeps it up I'll likely nominate it for AfD anyway. VoiceOfReason 19:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your advice is very useful, I might seem strange that I kept deleting it, not because I was ignoring the advice. I made corrections, then I delete the advice thinking that the editing was done. Again, there is a whole category in Wikipedia dedicating to Unites states Law firms, then the whole category is doom to be delete if my page is the problem.

If the deletion is because of my user name, which i chose after I decided to write the article, then all I am at fault is for being honest and not trying to cheat the system. Then I don't think I should be reprehended for honesty.

I would sincerely ask the editors and administrators to reconsider deleting my page.

Adorno&yoss 20:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Roberts

why did you delete the websites? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tonyro33 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 24 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Many thanks for helping fend off the vandals while Gregorian chant was on the main page. I wasn't prepared for the level of vandalism. It's heartening to know how efficient and diligent you WP admins and editors are to revert it! Peirigill 07:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Phorum/

Hi Nigel, looks like an IP made this page a couple of months ago. You can create talk pages by searching Talk:(name of article) without (name of article) having been made already, and I think that's probably what happened. Thanks for tagging it for deletion. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 00:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

call girl

it was as much content as the other 'link spams' you tit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.254.222.140 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 27 Aug 2006 (UTC)

And you will see I removed the others too --Nigel ^(Talk) 10:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Strange isn't it!

Indeed! :) You must have been pretty quick about it, I didn't even notice til you'd reverted. Thanks. Luna Santin 17:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SIM lock

You removed the External link I added to SIM lock. I think you thought I was advertising the web page or something. I wasn't. I have been trying to unlock my phone and it took me a while but I found this site, which works and is FREE. Check it out. When I started trying to unlock my phonr the first place I looked was Wikipedia but ther was no external links to the article. It would have saved me a lot of time if this link had been ther when I started. (I do understand you objection to commercial sites hijacking Wikipedia articles)--Trounce 11:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trudi Canavan

Sorry about adding the links but they are only to a forum and an encylopedia about her works, i didn' think they would be spam, ut nevermind. Mityryus 11:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you want to join any of the sites you can :D I am looking in to ways of having just one link for the sites. Mityryus 14:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh joy, i will just have to edit them all Mityryus 15:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actionreaction

I agree, but it'll stick better with an AFD consensus to delete. I have already had to warn the author for blanking the AFD tag. NawlinWiki 16:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please leave that damn McAfee ?

Hi Nigel I'm here again , look :http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andimeshk&action=history

this's an example, other cities of khouzestan province are changed by your damn McAfee , my website have no problem , iloveahvaz.xlphp.net ... check it , and please for God's sake change back your edits , because here in my country internet cost is so high, and I can't change all of them once a week ... ok ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.219.229.3 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 28 Aug 2006 (UTC)

- comment on user talk page - OK comments back to you. Don't put your links on so many pages. Go to McAfee SiteAdvisor and get them to check your site again. While it reports your site as being suspect I would not consider allowing links to it - thanks --Nigel ^(Talk) 07:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

have you any HTML knowledge ? right click on my pages then click view source and check it all , there's no virus or any thing , there's content.js which crazy McAfee thinks it want access your computer! but how ? through http ? isn't it funny ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.219.229.3 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 29 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Are you joking? what you linked to was the McAfee advisor for xlphp.net ! that's nothing to me ! I can't do anything, but yeah they've a register form which takes your information, but if you think I've get something in iloveahvaz to spy on anybody or something like that ! I can just say "NO" there's nothing there, but a good I'm going to register a domain for it, but unfortunately hosting providers want my whole information, my address, my phone, etc. and I can't trust them, so it takes time to find a anonymous way to register a domain, could you please leave my links alone until that time ? or what ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.219.229.3 (talk • contribs) 10:26, 31 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Link on "Desolation Row"

Before you accuse people of adding commercial links or private websites, you might want to actually look at them. The wikipedia story on Desolation row stated in the tag at the top "This article or section does not cite its references or sources. You can help Wikipedia by introducing appropriate citations."

I happened to have come across an article on the Minnesota Public Radio website (a subsidiary of NPR) which also suggests the link between Dylan's song and the lynching in Duluth, Minnesota. That was the story I linked the footnote to, as you would have known had you not made assumptions and actually looked at it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.220.42.4 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 29 Aug 2006 (UTC)

Replied to user talk page --Nigel ^(Talk) 17:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

Thanks :) But it took me a minute to figure out how to revert to the data that was there before the porn link. But I think I have it fixed. --StarGeek 18:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]