User talk:NiculescuGeorgeta
Hey thanks for updating this schematic, but could you please use the existing font or something similar that is easy to read? The font being used on your updated line schematics is very hard to read. Keep up the good work. Swarve 01:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of Image:Statia gorjului.jpg
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Statia gorjului.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Statia gorjului.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Statia gorjului.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Untrue
[edit]Hello my dear friend. I'm from Greece and let me know better that Ruslana NEVER got a certification from Greece. Wild Dances peaked at number 1 that's true and i didn't delete it as you saw. But she never got gold certification. Only Sertab managed to get a certification in Greece. And could you please give reliable sources about the certifications in Slovakia Czech Republic and other countries like IFPI? And as far i know Ukraine does not have singles chart. You should add reliable sources otherwise they'll be deleted. Look at the rules. And i don't hate her since i do not know her. If i really hated her i would have deleted number 1 positions on charts.--Chronisgr 13:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ruslana we new.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Ruslana we new.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The file File:Gorjuluistation.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Poor quality image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Paciistation.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
