User talk:Niconicodouga

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asahi Shimbun has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asahi Shimbun was changed by Niconicodouga (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890025 on 2014-08-29T12:12:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Asahi Shimbun, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC) Niconicodouga (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC) Description of the political stance of the Asahi Shimbun, editorial comparison of five companies newspaper of Japan. Especially compared and verified site that specializes on "the right to collective self-defense". ^[1][reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Asahi Shimbun. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC) Niconicodouga (talk) 03:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Please refrain from intimidation. 1. Stance of the newspaper, in describing space for five major Japanese newspapers of the English version already Has been described in the source without that it is a liberal, but it has not been deleted. 2. Source indicating that it has posted an editorial against the right of collective self-defense is presented already. Furthermore, concluded by the fact that you are opposed to the right to collective self-defense, you can determine that liberal.[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Asahi Shimbun. Jim1138 (talk) 05:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendations for Jim1138 to repeat the unwarranted interference

Please stop blackmail. >Jim1138. The political stance of the coverage of the newspaper, and that, to a comprehensive introduction to the report, other than to determine it, there is no proof of Shoga. In the case of Asahi Shimbun of Japan, for the "right of collective self-defense", reports attitude can be seen in a third party as a matter of course it is the editorial in the Asahi Shimbun. Articles footnote written by I, is an article against the editorial "right of collective self-defense" in the Asahi Shimbun in the past. That is, other than the method that I wrote, there is no verifiable way.

Or, if Nosere articles newspaper addition to the news and,'s liberal newspaper the Asahi Shimbun, do you become proof that you say?

Your claim is haphazard.

All I am asking, per wp:verifiability, is that you wp:cite a wp:reliable source that states that the newspaper is "liberal". That is all. This is per wp:burden. Also, try reading wp:civil. You are more likely to get cooperation if you try discussion rather than what you have added above and to my talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ [1]

[1] [1]

[1]