User talk:Nicoleplumridge
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Nicoleplumridge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deb (talk) 15:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
I hope you have good luck with your editings! Before you start, please read everything what is already there, including all pages on this SAQ (Shakespeare authorship question) topic. It is a lot, but the administrators do accept only the Stratfordian view. However, on the page on Edward de Vere as a person you may amend a lot, if you have and cite reliable sources (no blogs) as far as his personal life is concerned. More later. --Zbrnajsem (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- The next editing was then by Tom Reedy who is thought to be one of the best informed editors on Wikipedia for the Shakespeare authorship question and for Edward de Vere. This was his friendly welcome for you who are a new editor to whom we should behave friendly abiding the rules of Wikipedia. Please, be also friendly to him, User Nicoleplumridge, and be patient and careful with your editings. There are so many rules that it takes a lot of time to study them all, and it takes some experience with the ways how they are editing articles. The rules are not quite so strict for the Talk Pages. There the Freedom of Speech is more or less guaranteed, unless one uses inappropriate words or commits outward personal attacks. --Zbrnajsem (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
A topic of interest to you is covered by ArbCom sanctions--please read the links
[edit]
Because of the notification of your intentions you posted on the Edward de Vere talkpage, you need to be aware the the Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question#Final decision. Tom Reedy (talk) 20:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:The Authorship Debate.gif)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:The Authorship Debate.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}