User talk:Nicolelxr

June 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it will help to expand a little on the above message. Many new editors have surprisingly limited views on what the word "promotional" can mean. To give an extreme example, I once came across an editor who wrote a page of pure marketing speak, full of information about how his company's "solutions" were the best available for clients, and so on and so on, and appeared to genuinely think that the page could not be regarded as "promotional" because it didn't mention any prices. While that is an extreme and unusual case, it is surprisingly common for people to write pages full of what almost any objective outsider would see as promotion, but appear to sincerely not understand why. Any Wikipedia page the principal purpose of which appears to be to impress the reader with how good, great, noble, or beneficial its subject is, i.e. to promote it, is liable to deletion at any time without warning. Normally, draft articles are given much more leeway than actual articles, so that there is a chance for editing to remove the promotional content, but if it is not removed the page will not be suitable to become an article, and may eventually be deleted. Any editor who persistently edits in a promotional way after being warned about Wikipedia's policy on promotional editing is liable to be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolelxr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nicolelxr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Kuang-Chi Logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Kuang-Chi Logo.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuang-Chi has been accepted

Kuang-Chi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AntiVan (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Nicolelxr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Kuang-Chi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 12:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rachel123s. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 14:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]