User talk:Nicolejolma

February 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Leatherface has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Leatherface was changed by Nicolejolma (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928052 on 2018-02-12T22:23:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot was, in fact, wrong in this instance: your edit was not vandalism, but nonetheless the source that you did add was not an acceptable source because it was a blog and blogs are not acceptable sources for Wikipedia, see the self-published source policy. I've found a copy of the dead link source at the Internet Archive and linked to that, instead. Thank you, however, for making a valiant good-faith effort to improve Wikipedia. It's really appreciated. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg Greeley has been accepted

Greg Greeley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Breon (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Breon has been deleted 6 times from mainspace now. No AfC reviewer is going to move this. You will have to try yourself and make the page bullet proof

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Breon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Breon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 07:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nicolejolma! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 07:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello Nicolejolma. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Eric Breon, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nicolejolma. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nicolejolma|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicolejolma. I have the same concerns as Worldbruce. Please review the conflict of interest policies closely. --Ronz (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message." - Thank you for your responses! While I understand your concerns the only reason I was hoping to create the page was just because other influential people of this industry have had pages created as well. Is there not a way to just fact check my edits? Thanks!Nicolejolma (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Nicole Jolma[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Breon

Hello, Nicolejolma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Breon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nicolejolma. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Vacasa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Property investment calculator. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 21:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Vacasa Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Vacasa Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]