User talk:Nicole Corrado

Why do Freddie Highmore's eyes seem to change from blue to other colours on The Good Doctor?

I was watching The Good Doctor, and noticed that the lead actor Freddie Highmore's eyes, which are naturally blue, seemed somewhat brown or brown violet in certain scenes. Other scenes (mostly in the operating theatre) the blue colour was enhanced to a lapis lazuli. I Googled this and found nothing. Does he have a heterochromacy? Is this an optical illusions due to what colours are around him? (As a visual artist, I am suspecting the latter). But why is this? Does Crowd Science know why? Nicole Corrado (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Nicole Corrado, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 15:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Meters. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Beaconsfield, Quebec seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop promoting the dog pound. Source your material, keep it neutral, don't add external links, and don't add non-encyclopedic material. This isn't the dog pounds publicity page. Meters (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No,it isn’t. It is not less than neutral. The City of Beaconsfield refuses to put information about the pound on their website and the information about the pound is accurate. Nicole Corrado (talk) 01:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edited and removed some information. Do you work for the City of Beaconsfield? Nicole Corrado (talk) 01:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was never publicity for the dog pound. It has been edited and is now completely neutral. Nicole Corrado (talk) 03:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The City of Beaconsfield refuses to post anything about the pound. They don’t want to admit it is a tiny storage building with only three cages. Nicole Corrado (talk) 03:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would never promote a storage building full of junk that has only three dog cages in it. And I never posted about that. Nicole Corrado (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beaconsfield, Quebec. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop adding this material. Per WP:BRD please discuss this on the article's talk page.You are still breaking the WP:MOS, adding external links, and adding excessive information. And please read WP:COI. Wikipedia is not the place for you to take your feud with the city. Meters (talk) 06:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am really upset and confused as to why these are harmful or destructive edits. I am terrified that Meters is someone from the city. The city absolutely hates that I ever mentioned the dog pound, as they have nothing on their website. I was only trying to do the right thing. Nicole Corrado (talk) 09:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the issue, but this is ridiculous. I am almost certain the City of Beaconsfield is behind this. They refuse to mention anything about the dog pound on their website. Nicole Corrado (talk) 09:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not excess information, it is missing information. And no, there are no references online to the dog pound because the city refuses to post anything about it. Nicole Corrado (talk) 09:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Beaconsfield, Quebec, you may be blocked from editing. What are you doing? You removed an entire sourced section on homicides, with the false edit summary "added information" [1]. It's getting rather difficult to WP:AGF Meters (talk) 19:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicole Corrado! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Beaconsfield, Quebec several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Beaconsfield, Quebec, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You have already been pointed to WP:BRD and asked (more than once) to discuss these edits on the article's talk page. The talk page is at Talk:Beaconsfield, Quebec. I will start a discussion there. This has nothing to do with Beaconsfield employees, and everything to do with you continuing to add unsourced information about some minor city facility that you claim the city " refuse to mention anything about the dog pound on their website" and that only takes in "about two or three dogs" per year.. Meters (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beaconsfield Dog Pound

I don’t like that the dog pound is a tiny storage building, but I never posted that on Wikipedia. I removed a lot of information to make it neutral. Please do not remove all references to the dog pound. I am being driven crazy by the city who is threatening legal action because I let people know it exists. Nicole Corrado (talk) 01:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beaconsfield Dog Pound

I don’t like that the dog pound is a tiny storage building, but I never posted that on Wikipedia. I removed a lot of information to make it neutral. Please do not remove all references to the dog pound. I am being driven crazy by the city who is threatening legal action because I let people know it exists. Nicole Corrado (talk) 03:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]