User talk:Nickptar/Archive 4

Archives: 1 2 3

Thanks!

Enigma ^message 02:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your action

Thanks for your intervention in removing the Request for Delete for entry FINSAS. regards Arunram (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help me please? I tried to edit a article for the Hp Indigo and it says I can't edit due to vandalism. Ive never edited a article before so what vandalism have I done? I believe the only thing Ive ever done on here was talk on a discussion page about the HP Indigo and Men In Trees. I'm very new to Wikipedia so I'm not sure what Ive done wrong.Thanks in advance.--68.19.248.164 (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:JTWoodsworth

User:JTWoodsworth has been constantly adding the text "Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men from Mars" to every article he can, and has been constantly recreated pages redirected by administrators. He has ignored the consensus on the Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull talk page that it was not notable enough. The only way this user will stop is if he is blocked. ColdFusion650 (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa. Thank you for the information. ~~ N (t/c) 18:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And he did it again. He will not stop on his own. ColdFusion650 (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And he's done it again and again. I won't redirect it, on the chance that it may count as a revert, or some such as that. ColdFusion650 (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He also violated the 3RR again on the main Crystal Skull page. ColdFusion650 (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting.... ~~ N (t/c) 19:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taleb

Your comments about Taleb and Black Swan on my talkpage are incorrect. Taleb's books the Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness and his current profession have nothing to do with the Libertarian Party. The Black Swan theory is clearly not a political theory. LoveMonkey (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You miss my point; I'm not claiming that the theory has anything to do with political libertarianism, only that it has nothing to do with free will or Dostoevsky, and that Taleb's one reference to libertarianism you mention is to the political kind. I have removed the links again. ~~ N (t/c) 00:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

??? The Black Swan is a representation or articulation of the long standing tradition of Cappadocian Pyrrhonism. Taleb states that not me. Notes from Underground gives the same logical arguments against Platonicity as Pyrrhonism does. Randomness gives the wiggle room needed to validate the freewill (and I am not speaking strictly on the subatomic particle level). What do you need Professor Taleb to specifically say in order for the link to be added? LoveMonkey (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Yeah I am aware. I was using huggle and I hit the wrong button. (I can't link to the edit now that the page is deleted, but I did at least attempt to put the correct tag on it after I did that.) thanks for letting me know about it. Also, you may want to salt that page if you haven't already done so because according to this, that's the fourth recreation. Thanks again. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 20:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Marish Puri

The real problem with that page is that its just a typo for Amrish Puri, who already has a substantial article. It could have been made a redirect, but it seems unlikely that many other people would make the same mistake. - SimonP (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. It'd have been nice if you'd noted that in the deletion summary. ~~ N (t/c) 17:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circpn reduced.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Circpn reduced.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uncircpn reduced.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uncircpn reduced.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

Due to long term inactivity, I have removed the bot flags from N-Bot (talk · contribs). Should you return to Wikipedia and wish to resume their use, please contact the Bot Approvals Group. WJBscribe (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]