User talk:Nickcreevy

Welcome!

Hello, Nickcreevy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nicholas Creevy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Creevy

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Creevy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, read WP:COI as it appears you wrote this article about yourself.

Please don't recreate articles that have been deleted. This is considered vandalism. If you wish an article restored, you have two options:

Courteously contact one of the deleting admins to request the restoration. You will be asked to provide a reason for the restoring of the article, including a rationale that addresses the original concern of why the article was deleted.
List the article for deletion review.

Failing to do either and recreating the article on your own will be regarded as blatant vandalism and your account will be blocked. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Creevy

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nicholas Creevy, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~Darth Starbo 14:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 days from editing for recreating page deleted after warnings above. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. UtherSRG (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickcreevy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why I have been blocked, I created a article perfectly with all the correct information about the person, could somebody explain to me what I have done wrong here?

Decline reason:

Judging by your username, you either are or are related to the subject of the article that you were trying to create. While you should not have been blocked for vandalism, you clearly have a serious conflict of interest on this topic. For this reason, I am declining your request. GlassCobra 14:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Creevy (photographer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Creevy (photographer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cind.amuse 04:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Nicholas Creevy (photographer). This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Cind.amuse 04:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Nicholas Creevy (photographer), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cind.amuse 04:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lady Gaga. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lady Gaga was changed by Nickcreevy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872657 on 2011-02-04T08:30:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you trigger the filter log trying to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nicholas Creevy (photographer), you will be blocked from editing. See filter log for further information. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 08:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of a thread concerning your behavior and edits

A posting concerning your behavior and edits has been made at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. You should expect to here back from them soon. In the intern, I caution that any attempt to recreate the photographer page will result in it being deleted, and may result in your being permanently blocked from the site. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edit at Lady Gaga was vandalism, looks like this is a purely disruptive account.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 08:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, after a review of your edits, and in particular that stunt with the Lady Gaga article, I've decided to block you for the following reasons

Disruptive editing
Vandalism
Notability
Spam
COI issues
And lastly, what I believe are WP:USERNAME issues.

If you'd like to contest the block, feel free to edit here, but note that if you prove to be disruptive in this space we'll adjust you block to keep you from editing or email anyone. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Although you will be unable to do anything about it, under the rules of Wikipedia I am obligated to leave this message here): Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.