User talk:Nickbigd

CLICK HERE FOR A "NEW MESSAGE" BOX - THANKS!

Re: Italian opera edits

Yes! To mark words as foreign-language use lang tags - I've done it in the la donna article as an example for you. AWB then recognises the text as Italian, so doesn't apply English corrections to it. Thanks Rjwilmsi 22:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kath Battle

Hw about posting a short message on the Opera Project? -- Kleinzach 01:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the suggestions of Voceditenore. They were very useful; the comments of Ronz were also useful and remind us to "pay careful attention to WP:BLP and WP:NPOV" Because we are discussing a living person, views on whom differ greatly, we will see multiple sides. My only intention is that facts, not statements and perceptions based on the statement from giver's personal baggage, will be allowed to stand. It is a fact that she was dismissed. It was a fact that she rearranged her schedule, (but many singers including pavarotti do this), and it is a fact that cast members were happy that she was dismissed. But that does not mean she was difficult. It could mean that Volpe was an ineffective manager and that the cast was petty. But issues like this can not be verified and cannot be considered fact, because humans are involved and are not always capable of providing a NPOV. Hrannar 21:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first off all, in response to ignoring general requests to stop reverting your edits, the both of us have equal say...unless an admin steps in and makes a decision. So your requests are courteous. But I don't have to adhere to them, if it doesn't seem fit. However, I did not intentionally put the gracious back in. At least not since the admininstrators have stepped in. However, I did provide you with links to two sources discussing her as gracious if you care to look at the talk page. So I request that you respect the democratic, collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. And recognize that all members have equal say. And if we cannot agree, than we can request the input of other parties. It was, in fact, a good idea to bring in wikipedia experts for their guidance. It seems to have helped! Take care. 129.74.18.183 23:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you state that I "purport to cite." I don't really understand what that means. The two articles I cited exist. And you read them, though you did not see or chose not to read the entire articles. The first, the Bermuda review, states, "Indeed, so well received that this gracious and generous artist returned again and again to perform more of the same..."; in the second article, published by the Cleveland Institute of Music, it says, quoting Portsmouth Mayor Franklin Gerlach, "(She) is entirely gracious and in control." I get it. You don't think she's gracious. But others do. 129.74.18.183 23:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sills three queens.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sills three queens.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Dallas-Fort Worth Meetup

~~Hi!~~ ~~Hello!~~ Howdy! You've been invited to the Dallas/Fort Worth meetup (part of Wikipedia:Meetup). If you are interested, visit our page and sign up and suggest something, or help us decide where and when the next meeting will be. Cheers!
Message delivered by SteveCrossinBot (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hohensalzburg

Hi there, just wondering why is in your todo's Hohensalzburg when there is already an article called Festung Hohensalzburg ... is it the same? Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 03:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"no citation provided for any official "discouragement" of "ugly" solicitation for free image"

See Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders. --Klein zach 23:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

Hi Nickbigd,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

Each casebook will have a subpage.

Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.

I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.

2. If you're a law student,

Email http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Hornbook to your classmates, and tell them to do the same.
Contact me directly via talk page or email about coordinating a chapter of "Student WP:Hornbook Editors" at your own school.

(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)

3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 20:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Wikipedia Ambassadors

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian associated with Harvard. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at schools in Boston and Cambridge (including Harvard), which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Boston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.

If you're an experienced and active Wikipedian, you might be interested alternatively in becoming an Online Ambassador. The role of Online Ambassadors is to serve as mentors for students; it doesn't require any in-person outreach. Take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Aspern Papers (opera), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Stilwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WaterTower Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page After Midnight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JeffersonCityseal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JeffersonCityseal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nickbigd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law

Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]