User talk:Nickaveni125

Welcome!

Hello, Nickaveni125, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvan

Thanks for your addition to the Sylvan article. Your addition, however, was not supported by a reliable source. Content in Wikipedia is supposed to be supported by trustworthy sources (although, granted, a lot of it isn't). Please try to keep that in mind when editing. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you probably added that to the wrong page. The proper place for that information probably should have been at Sylvan (disambiguation). Before you edit that page though, you should take a look at Help:Disambiguation. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Axingmayra

The example really helps to understand the formula about iron butterfly (options strategy). Maybe also create a table to contract the difference between the other option strategies at the same situation. Also, it is good to add one sentence to summarize the advantages and disadvantages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.119.155.88 (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? No, the in-text citation is missing.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? The writing is relevant to the topic, especially the great example.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral, and the explanation is clear.

Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted? The information comes from the professional economic website, such as the official website of Options Industry Council.

Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented? No, the viewpoints is great.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? The citations is missing, and the example is almost the same as from the original website.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The information is not out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axingmayra (talk • contribs) 12:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iron Butterfly.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iron Butterfly.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]