User talk:Nickaang

Hello!

Welcome to Nickaang's talk page!
Please, feel free to leave your comments but don't forget to sign your post.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Nickaang}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Regards for the revision and comment...

Thank You very much for the comment!!! I was quite surprised by the quick revision... Hope the article has met all norms and probably not end up as a stub... Once again thank you, man!!!Ajayupai95 (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope too! The article looks perfect and thanks to you too for such an good article :) Regards, NickAang (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your kind response needed

Hello, this is another mate on the English Wikipedia. I've found your contributions to the articles created by User:BengaliHindu and i'd appreciated your comments on those articles. I'm requesting your comments as i feel some false accusation are being made without reliable sources in those articles. Specially, i found this article 2013 Canning riots with lots of bias. May be i'm wrong but it may also possible that such articles were created per Islamophobia. I'd deeply appreciate your comments. Best Regards, Mrwikidor ←track 16:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Joe LaFratta

Hello, Nickaang,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Joe LaFratta should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe LaFratta .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickaang. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickaang. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 11:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickaang, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

220 of ^Borg 08:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aliah Logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aliah Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 18:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Cedric Smith.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cedric Smith.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 18:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Katlynn Simon Smith.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katlynn Simon Smith.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 18:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aliah University Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aliah University Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickaang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! I have been blocked for several years and I have learnt my lesson. I totally understand why I was blocked and as advised I have kept myself away from editing Wikipedia. I promise I will not make any disruptive edits which may lead to blocking my account again. I will only make constructive contribution as per Wikipedia policy. I humbly request to unblock me and give me a chance please. Nickaang ←chat 09:36, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Because of your rampant abuse, you are considered banned. See WP:CBAN. You will need to follow the instructions provided in WP:UNBAN if you wish this to be lifted. Your request will need to be discussed by the community. You will need a substantially more convincing request than provided here, which doesn't even mention your sockpuppetry at all. Yamla (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nickaang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #26039 was submitted on Jul 22, 2019 16:22:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evan Kosiner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Kosiner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Kosiner (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:West Bengal Board of Secondary Education.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West Bengal Board of Secondary Education.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]