User talk:Nick UK took a falldown in 2005

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sky1. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bonusballs (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Sky1, you may be blocked from editing. Bonusballs (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 in British Television, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bonusballs (talk) 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Unorginal (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Bonusballs (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]