User talk:Nick Dillinger/Archives/2006/June
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Nick Dillinger. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Warning
Personal attacks, such as this one [1] are not acceptable on Wikipedia, especially when it is combined with the vandalism of a user page. Fortunately User:Garion96 has taken in it good humour, but please watch your conduct in future, and try to remain civil. ed g2s • talk 20:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Shut up, you bellend.
The Black Hand
Hi Nick. I'm afraid I believe that consensus was reached. Of the five people who expressed a view, you were the only one asking for the article to be kept, and while it's not a numerical vote that it 4:1 against. —Whouk (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Image:Carmen electra scary movieOrig.jpg listed for deletion
Abu Badali 18:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi. Please don't re-upload content that has been deleted. Any such material is a candidate for speedy deletion. Thanks. Jkelly 22:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I am going to assume that your comment about hurting wikipedia was directed at the guy who keeps deleting the fair use images, leaving nothing but the mugshot. I am fine with having the mugshot in there (well, fairly fine) but not as the only photo, because it carries the impression that she's a career criminal. But that guy keeps deleting the fair use images based on his personal interpretation of the rules, and starts the cycle over again. Wahkeenah 19:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, you should ask an actual Admin for a ruling on it. You could also post that mugshot for deletion on the grounds that it's inherently POV. You could point out that you were unaware that uploading it would lead to this "lame edit war" as you so aptly put it. Wahkeenah 19:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Greetings friend! We got your mediation case down at the Mediation Cabal, and I'm here to help you out. Right now I'm reading the talk page and article history to get a firm idea of what's going on. Replies can be posted either here, or on my talk page. I hope we can get this settled rather cleanly, heh. -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake {Prophesize) 17:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- ER... well. It's been a while since you filed your case, and you haven't really replied to my message... so unless I get a reply soon, I'll be closing the case for reasons of inactivity. Thank you for your time. -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake {Prophesize) 01:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Kleibrink_shannon060214_cp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kleibrink_shannon060214_cp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Didohot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Didohot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
