User talk:NickNbeezy

IDance

A tag has been placed on IDance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of IDance and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Willking1979 (talk) 19:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Polo

Please do not remove the prod tag from this article. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Usher (entertainer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 17:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marco Polo (song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Marco Polo (song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Polo (song). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? XxJoshuaxX (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Marco Polo (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 17:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "ISouljaBoy (2008)"

A page you created, ISouljaBoy (2008), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. So#Why 17:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of JBar

A tag has been placed on JBar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 17:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No notability for IDance (Soulja Boy Song)

Next time, try to add an article you created some notability, I deleted the article because of lack of notability. Check WP:MUSIC#Songs to know what makes a song notable for its own article. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 19:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Soulja Boy (Donk) .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soulja Boy (Donk) .jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Soulja Boy (Yums) .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soulja Boy (Yums) .jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Marco Polo Screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marco Polo Screenshot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:I Soulja Boy.png

Thanks for uploading Image:I Soulja Boy.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Chris Brown Soulja Boy.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Brown Soulja Boy.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gucci Mane.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gucci Mane.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TI and Soulja Boy.jpg

Just checking, but do you actually own the copyright to the Image:TI and Soulja Boy.jpg image? It looks like you've been engaged in a number of copyright violations so I wanted to double check. JBsupreme (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:SOD Money Gang Mixtape.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SOD Money Gang Mixtape.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Lil Wayne smoke.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Lil Wayne smoke.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Lil Wayne smoke.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 00:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TI and Soulja Boy.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:TI and Soulja Boy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ian¹³ /t 08:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Soulja Boy Performs.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Soulja Boy Performs.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hello, Nick. I notice you've uploaded a lot of images here without including detailed information as to where you got the images or what sort of copyright is present on them. This information is very important to Wikipedia, as we are a free-content project. All content (including images) must either be verifiably in the public domain or under a free license such as those available from Creative Commons or the GFDL. If they are copyrighted, they must fit within our non-free content criteria to ensure they qualify for our use under "fair use" laws. This includes providing a descriptive copyright tag as well as a rationale for the image's use. For more information, please see WP:COPY. In the meantime, please do not upload any more images until you fully understand our copyright policies. We have to take copyright very seriously at Wikipedia, and repeated violations may result in a WP:BLOCK. Thanks for your time, and please take a moment to read through the pages I've linked. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ISouljaBoyTellEm

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ISouljaBoyTellEm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 00:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ISouljaBoyTellEm

I have nominated ISouljaBoyTellEm, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISouljaBoyTellEm. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 21:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Isouljaboytellem.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Isouljaboytellem.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ISouljaBoyTellEm

A tag has been placed on ISouljaBoyTellEm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 14:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating this article at different titles. If you wish to appeal the deletion, make a listing at deletion review. Further recreations of this article may lead to you being blocked from editing. Stifle (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

READY

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to READY. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

iSouljaBoyTellEm (album)

You've been repeatedly warned to stop creating this article. If you continue to disregard Wikipedia policy you will be blocked. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bird Walk

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bird Walk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Soulja Boy Bird Walk Cover.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Soulja Boy Bird Walk Cover.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 17:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Soulja Boy HD.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Soulja Boy HD.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Soulja Boy HD.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kanonkas : Talk 17:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Soulja Boy HD.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Soulja Boy HD.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 17:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Bow Wow.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://music.aol.com/picture/bow-wow/recording-artist-bow-wow-attends-the/07-680-3343. As a copyright violation, Image:Bow Wow.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Bow Wow.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Bow Wow.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Bow Wow.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Bow Wow.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 00:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to upload copyrighted images, or images without proper source and license information, despite numerous warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ISouljaBoyTellEm (cover).png)

Thanks for uploading Image:ISouljaBoyTellEm (cover).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Isouljaboytellem (Album).png

Thanks for uploading Image:Isouljaboytellem (Album).png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as ISouljaBoyTellEm (Soulja Boy Tell Em Album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 22:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 21:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NickNbeezy1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mixwell!^Talk 15:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to one month from today for using accounts to evade your block. While blocked, you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. Continuing to use sockpuppets to evade your block may result in an indefinite block on your main account. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 15:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IDance

The article IDance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 04:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IDance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IDance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDance (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Waxworker (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]