User talk:Nick37

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. Makemi 05:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory0 96 10:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Zarpua listed for deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sam Zarpua, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Zarpua. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Tuspm ^{Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me} 23:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Hartley

A tag has been placed on Elaine Hartley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Tdl1060 19:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Filippo Raciti

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Filippo Raciti, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/6326513.stm. As a copyright violation, Filippo Raciti appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Filippo Raciti has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Filippo Raciti. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Filippo Raciti, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have also tagged Nancy siddoway for speedy deletion as it seems to me that it has been copied from a newspaper or TV website. I don't know which, but it reads like journospeak. Likewise, Leonard Fraser was a copy from ABC Australia, and Kemal Kolenovic seems to be a pick and mix from an AP report. Please do not submit copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Charles Scripps

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Charles Scripps, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070204/NEWS0104/702040355/1060/NEWS01. As a copyright violation, Charles Scripps appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Charles Scripps has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Charles Scripps. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Charles Scripps, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. WWGB 14:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Filippo Raciti

An editor has nominated Filippo Raciti, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filippo Raciti and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 10:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Scripps

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Scripps. We cannot accept copyrighted material for legal reasons, as it is not compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License. Your contributions must be in your own words. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Come again

Please, what is a campagin? -- RHaworth 08:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign websites as Wikipedia articles

Hello, Nick. I've been looking over the series of articles you've recently created (as well as your other recent edits), and I am impressed by your apparent enthusiasm for politics. However, I'm sorry to have to inform you that it simply isn't appropriate to take whole pages of text straight off of campaign websites and turn them into newly-created Wikipedia articles. Doing that is completely contrary to both the purpose of Wikipedia and its basic rules and guidelines, above all Neutral Point of View and Use of copyrighted material.

I expect that, in all likelihood, all of those new articles will shortly be deleted from Wikipedia for that reason. So please refrain from creating any more such articles that you may have in mind. But please keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you take the time to learn more about the guidelines for editing, etc. I'm sure you will make some valuable contributions.

Regards, Cgingold 13:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Copyvio tags

Hello, Nick. Please don't be removing the Copyvio tags from those 3 articles -- that's against Wikipedia rules. And doing it without logging in doesn't make it okay, either. (It only leaves a black mark on your record.) If you really want to contribute to Wikipedia, please read up on the guidelines. Any time you need help, if you don't know where to get an answer, all you have to do is add the {{helpme}} tag on your talk page, along with your question. Cgingold 06:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John H. Cox presidential campaign

An article that you created, John H. Cox presidential campaign has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John H. Cox presidential campaign Thank you. SkierRMH 21:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Hartley

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Elaine Hartley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster _talk 02:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Roger Jennings. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Chris 21:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nick helping Wikipedia be protected

A tag has been placed on Nick helping Wikipedia be protected, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 05:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 granite city elections

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as 2007 granite city elections. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 23:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, Raymond Lee Harvey, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on August 4 where you can improve it if you see fit. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 10:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

A tag has been placed on Ilinois United States Senate election, 2002, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --== Waycool²⁷ ==-- 03:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Edward O'Reilly (Attorney)

A tag has been placed on Edward O'Reilly (Attorney) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Treygdor 00:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nick Raftopoulos

A tag has been placed on Nick Raftopoulos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 22:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Presidential Election 2032

A tag has been placed on U.S. Presidential Election 2032, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carados (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of U.S. Presidential Election 2032

A tag has been placed on U.S. Presidential Election 2032, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elassint (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as U.S. Presidential Election 2032, you will be blocked. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Romney presidential Campaign 1968

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article George Romney presidential Campaign 1968, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of George Romney presidential Campaign 1968. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Wallace presidential campaign 1968

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article George Wallace presidential campaign 1968, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of George Wallace presidential campaign 1968. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968

I have nominated Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 05:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of George Wallace presidential campaign 1968

I have nominated George Wallace presidential campaign 1968, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Wallace presidential campaign 1968. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

Hey, just wanted you to know that as a registered editor, you can create a page. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 23:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2012 presidential election

I have nominated 2012 presidential election, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 presidential election. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Allen Keyes presidential campagin 2008

A tag has been placed on Allen Keyes presidential campagin 2008 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 20:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Thomas O'Grady

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Thomas O'Grady, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Thomas O'Grady was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Thomas O'Grady, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Delaware primary,2004

A tag has been placed on Delaware primary,2004 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 16:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PROD of South Carolina primary, 2004

South Carolina primary, 2004

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article South Carolina primary, 2004, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of South Carolina primary, 2004. David Shankbone 05:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008

Nick, since you almost tripled the size of Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008, could you explain where you got the text from? I am trying to fix the two broken citations (found at the Arnold sentence under Super Tuesday). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please stop, you say you want to fight vandalism but you are inadvertently being a vandal in your own right. You need to stop making duplicate articles. This is extremely disruptive and is vandalism. Your edits will be deleted and if you continue you will be labeled a vandal and blocked. So while you have the chance stop making duplicate articles. If you need help seek adoption from an experienced editor. Rgoodermote 23:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just warned not to make duplicate articles and that you are not a vandal yet but will be if you continue. Rgoodermote 18:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2004 Iowa Caucuses

Nick37, you recent edit to the Iowa Democratic caucuses, 2004 is obvious vandalism. Cease and desist. Bigvinu (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lin Yud

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lin Yud, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nsk92 (talk) 02:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Missouri primary, 2004

I have nominated Missouri primary, 2004, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missouri primary, 2004. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Muboshgu (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Nick37! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 61 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Bill Renick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jim Rowe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pat Quinn Gubernatorial administration

The article Pat Quinn Gubernatorial administration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

redundant article- events are well covered in Pat Quinn (politician). I would add that this article is an orphan; it's clear that those with an interest in the politics of Illinois have focused their efforts on Pat Quinn (politician)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Quiet Editor (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Nick37,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michigan Democratic caucuses, 2004

The article Michigan Democratic caucuses, 2004 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No other caucus for Michigan has its own page. No sources, no content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene McCarthy presidential campagin 1968 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eugene McCarthy presidential campagin 1968. Since you had some involvement with the Eugene McCarthy presidential campagin 1968 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Dicklyon (talk) 03:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Keyes presidential campagin 2008 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Allen Keyes presidential campagin 2008. Since you had some involvement with the Allen Keyes presidential campagin 2008 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Dicklyon (talk) 03:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2006 Nebraska's 3rd congressional district election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 Nebraska's 3rd congressional district election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Nebraska's 3rd congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2006 Georgia's 8th congressional district election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 Georgia's 8th congressional district election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Georgia's 8th congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Connecticut's 4th congressional district election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Connecticut's 4th congressional district election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Connecticut's 4th congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 23:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Rowe

The article Jim Rowe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable political candidate. A WP:BEFORE search, including on newspapers.com, only returned typical local election coverage with no WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]