User talk:Nichalp/Archive31

SVG Locator maps

I didn't know SVGs are XML based until you mentioned it. I did some search and found Infobox protected area. With little research, I think we can create something like that. - Ganeshk (talk) 15:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Home Guard

Thanks for your reply. Without wasting your precious time I intend to add a link at least at References against self memory in the above article as under*. Otherwise this wording has no meaning. The originator for Home guards is also indicated below** which I enlarged***. The links are indicated below for your quick reference. Your suggestions please.

User:Dore_chakravarty*

(cur) (last) 19:08, 13 July 2004 Nichalp (law enforcement agiencies)**

(cur) (last) 09:54, 25 October 2005 Dore chakravarty (New article-Home Guards)***

(cur) (last) 20:29, 8 January 2006 68.85.27.47 (merged Home Guards article with Indian Home Guard.)

(2006 68.85.27.47)---Who is this knowledgeable gentleman please?

--Dore chakravarty 21:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dores-TG Cycle diag1.jpg

Thanks very much for fixing the copyright problem. I missed this. Sorry for the lapse.

--Dore chakravarty 05:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capacity of Brabourne

Cricinfo puts the capacity of the Brabourne Stadium as 20,000, but according to the sources 1 & 3 in the references listed in the article it was built to accomodate 35,000 people. This is another source which puts it as 35,000 while an article about a Rolling stones concert has it as 25,000. Is there any way to find the correct figure. Tintin (talk) 06:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Brabourne stadium will get some coverage in the media when it hosts the Champions trophy final and people may come around looking for info about it. Cricinfo article is nothing exceptional, so if we improve the article a little bit more, we can upstage theirs. Tintin (talk) 06:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hi Nichalp

Let me first thank you for creating all the Indian stadia pages. We wouldn't have gotten anywhere without them. Now I have created a modified Infobox for the stadia which I have put on certain stadium pages (see Brabourne Stadium). As I consider you to be the person most interested in these pages, I would like your opinion about them & whether I should continue & put them on all the other pages.

Thanks

Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 06:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the Infobox needs to be made more attractive. But I am not very good at creating tables & other stuff. Even this Infobox is a modified version of Template:Infobox Test team. We should get someone good at making tables & general wikicoding. Or do you think you can do it? Either way should I add the current Infobox to the other stadia article? Thanks

Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 07:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Home Guard

Why is he (User:68.85.27.47) not creating an account and do edits? Please see his talk page: interestig for administrators to act.

--Dore chakravarty 04:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Institutes of Technology article

Hi Nichalp,

Its been a quite an experience improving the Indian Institutes of Technology article. I feel that it has reached a state where it can seriously thought of as an Featured Article candidate. I have done my best to create as many relevant sections as possible, but the uniqueness of the topic (and absence of FA like this) had made the work difficult. Please have another look and share your views. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh peer review

How about the current state of the Bangladesh page? We've tried to address almost everything commented in the peer review. Thanks in advance ... --Ragib 03:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kolkata review

Hi! No problem! Thank you. And I found out the vehicle codes, thanks to a friend. It is just like you said, WB-01 to 04. Bye!--Dwaipayanc 15:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just dropped in to say that word. I'm getting back into the wikiSwing-of-it, and was amazed at the rust that built up in the brain during the seven months away. Best regardsFrankB 18:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket

Hi Nichalp:

Thanks for your invitation from a few months ago. I've been out of circulation for a while but I should be able to contribute more now.

--Baggie 19:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Srigranth

Template:Srigranth has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Andy123(talk) 06:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frustrated and Insulted

Hi, I'm just asking you this because you are a known administrator. Anon User:219.78.172.189 has reverted my edits and added his own POV to Indian Armed Forces and Superpower. We tried to get a discussion started on Talk:Superpower, but he refused to listen to comments and called all contributors blind India-lovers and said that India has a weak Education System so that Indians cannot do mathematics. I don't think this should happen in discussions on Wikipedia and I and Spartian have since withdrawn to let him keep his edits. I don't want to be in violation of 3RR as well. What should I do? Is there a better place to tell someone about such matters? Or am I taking the whole discussion the wrong way? I would appreciate some advice. Thanks. Nobleeagle (Talk) 08:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I don't remember taking any personal attacks on User:219.78.172.189 apart from saying he's a China-lover in response to his constant repetition of the India-lover comment. I'm sure you'd understand my position and the frustration I'd felt at the idea that I was completely losing the credibility of all of my edits in the International Power articles. My main point was that I decided that until the discussion was resolved, all articles should remain the same and that the Superpower article should just refer to the two armies as one of the largest. The American paramilitary might be large and overtake them for all we know. However, he reverted my edits and went on to take his Point of View to Indian armed forces etc. Nobleeagle (Talk) 02:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You would love this...

Hi,

Have a look at this. Just start reading from the education section onwards. This guy has just copied the text from IIT's article and put it up on NIT's article by replacing IIT by NIT. At some places, he has even forgotton to replace the NIT by IIT. I couldn't stop laughing for full two minutes after seeing this. Even more so because 90% of that text was written by me for the IIT article.

-Ambuj Saxena (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVG Map

While you are working on the map, could you create a grid like this? - Ganeshk (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It will help with the locatorX and locatorY coordinates. - Ganeshk (talk) 18:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just found Locator grid will help do it. - Ganeshk (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still thinking about this. They have created a seperate set to values for the dot. In the above examples, locatorX and locatorY are not the latitude and longitude, but manually entered values that specify the position of the dot on the map. The bot now has to somehow convert the latitude and longitude values to the position values. If you have any ideas about this conversion, do let me know. - Ganeshk (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nichal, Any luck with the map? Can I see a draft may be? :) - Ganeshk (talk) 16:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Oops! Sorry I did not notice the inuse template in Kolkata. Incidentally happened to be editing at the same time. I'm off now. Thanks. --Dwaipayanc 13:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have a question. Can you tell me if all the articles relating to India of 1911 Britannica have been incorporated to Wikipedia? I don't think so. Again, some months ago there was some talks (I cannot remember which talk page) that India related articles have benn entered to Wikipedia. Is it so? I am asking you for I need the info to create Calcutta Presidency. In the available EBs in the web, both Bombay and Madras presidency are available, whereas Calcutta is also available, but not anything on Calcutta Presidency, neither on Bengal. Can you throw some light? I have tried ro adress the embedded comments you left in the article Kolkata. Thanks a lot. Bye.--Dwaipayanc 15:45, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Kolkata

Thanks a lot for your copyedit. Yes I feel that "History" reads choppy. Basically, a compromise between a great read and information-content have to be made, I fear, unless someone rewrites the section in really good English. I am not that much adept at writting English. I will request others. If you get time, can you please?

Regarding the districts, Kolkata Municipal Corporation area does include some portions of North and South 24 Parganas. But most of these 2 districts are not within KMC. Large prtions of North and South 24 Parganas are within Kolkata Metropolitan Area though. No portions of Howrah, Hooghly and Nadia are under KMC.

I just want to clarify by comparing with Mumbai. Is Mumbai suburban district under Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation? There is only one district under KMC - Kolkata. I thought "districts" should include all districts which/parts of which are under Kolkata Metropolitan Area. Seems this is not the case. Thanks for pointing out. If you suggest, we'll remove the names of those districts. And retain only Kolkata. Under "urban strucrures", all those districts that are part of KMA have been, and will remain, mentioned. Bye.--Dwaipayanc 18:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I had a sigh of relief seeing that you did not point out anything wrong with the "Geography". LoL. I just wonder what will you do with "Culture". Waiting to see...!!! Bye!

Username

I've created a new user account User:I@n. Is this allowable? - I can't see anything in Wikipedia:Username to say it isn't, other than: avoid non-Latin characters, not that you cannot have a single one, but would be grateful for your guidance. If OK I intend to submit a request for a username change to it. -- Ian ≡ talk 03:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Obviously the instructions have changed and I was too lazy to reread them before creating. -- I@n 00:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Few clarifications

Hi Nichalp,

I am busy doing the changes you suggested. Meanwhile, I have a few doubts and would be happy if you can resolve them.

First of all, what is the difference between GFDL(GNU Free Documentation License) and PD(Public Domain). I have already seen the articles on them without any success in understanding the difference. Aren't GFDL documents open to public use? All the images created by me are tagged {{GFDL-self}}, but I don't have any idea if {{PD-self}} would be more appropriate or not.

Secondly, I couldn't understand the context of your saying "IITB also has a geology department. Please check." Even if it does have one, where should the changed be made, if at all they are to be done since this is a very minor issue.

Thirdly, I would be happy if you can suggest some neutral title to "Success story". Few of my attempts have been reverted by other authors as they felt the titles suggested by me are inappropriate. Even I feel so, but I have no clue what would be most appropriate.

Thanks,

-Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have almost completed editing per your request barring a couple of places. Firstly, I couldn't find detailed reasons of why IIT Roorkee was chosen as an IIT. Most of the places just mention that it was chosen because of long time demand and its educational standard (nothing else mentioned). This is already mentioned in the article. Secondly, I am yet to add the "preferred IIT" section as I feel it would be too much of POV and unverifiable. At best we can write that people prefer IITs on the basis of following factors 1) Their place of residence 2) The degree offered and 3) Location (Urban like IITB or semi-urban like IITKGP). Still I prefer not to write this as it will still require sources, which I am afraid are lacking. There are a few more requests that I feel have been done, but I don't know if that was what you wanted. Do visit the page again and give your comments. I will be going on a bit long wiki-break (3 weeks) sometime this week and want to close the Peer Review before I leave (as there isn't any other editor committed to the article). Hopefully when I come back in May, the article will be ready for FA candidature. Regards, -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for the reply. I will keep these things in mind while uploading any more images. Its not that I "feel like closing the PR"; Its just that with my experience I have realized that an open PR means that there are editors waiting for people to give reviews and make the changes in a short notice. Since I am the only active editor of the article, I thought that before going I should close the PR so that there's no confusion. On second thoughts, I may still keep it open as I feel that I will be unable to keep myself from Wikipedia even during exams. Looks like the whole Indian wikipedia group is going on leave. Bhadani is dormant, you are editing less, Arundhati is gone, and so is Aksi great. Now in a few days even I will be going for some time. Looks like time will run slow for India on Wikipedia. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rabindranath Tagore

Between 10-11 kilobytes have been shaved off ([1]), while most of the content notes have been removed. I　don't think I can summarize this any further. Could you take another look? Thank you. Saravask 02:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much better now. I've lent my support. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Major Cities of India

Hello! I noticed that you changed Template:Major Cities of India to list only the metros of India. I believe that has made the template redundant, as there is already a template (Template:Metropolitan cities of India) that lists metros in India. Please comment. thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK} 09:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at Wikipedia:Changing username?

Thank you.

Template required

I believe that we require a template for using pictures/media from government sites of India. (I am aware that an earlier attempt to bring up this template had been rejected by the community). I am unsure about the licensing issues. --Andy123(talk) 12:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnah PR

Hi - I request your help on an effort to make this article an FA. I know you can really help us solve some serious problems and add reliable info. Please check it out whenever convenient. Rama's Arrow 16:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh FAC

Hi, I think we handled most of your comments in the peer review. We've nominated it for FAC, please check that out. Thanks. --Ragib 16:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Do you Advise on this?

What would you think about the wisdom of posting a discrete link to this notice at the very page top Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals, and how do you like the concept? Something in a box saying See this New Notice (Flashing lights and sirens wouldn't be enough as far as I can see!) Sigh! Back to content edits!

Fair Warning! I'm messing with some India related topics (History ommisions/sidelinks in Seven Years War era). Trust Me!!! <G>

Best! FrankB 20:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can forget this as a priority my friend. I've annoted, but address only for curiosity. one word: 'Cologneblue' would have avoided 'Egg on Face' (under 1st link)<G>. Best regards, FrankB 04:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the Above again, More Egg

Oops: I apparently didn't save the edit to the Category page... Here's the current note just posted:

I apparently never saved out on the edit I was recommending. It should have looked like This example or when polished for presentation and organization, the current: Category:History of Canada . Apparently too many open browser windows, or the like. Apologies FrankB 21:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attention

Hey! India is up for removal of featured status. Please add your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/India. Help!!--Dwaipayanc 05:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kolkata review

Hi! I have tried to address the points you raised in Review of Kolkata. Please see when you get some time. We are in no hurry. So take time, but please review, as usual, thoroughly! Bye.--Dwaipayanc 09:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, I just saw those. Will let you know when those are addressed. Thanks for this section-wise review. It becomes easy to rectify the errors in this way. Bye.--Dwaipayanc 18:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red links have been made blue. Embedded comments have been addressed , with reference, if necessary. Civic administration was almost rewritten. Please see. Two points remain:

I am not sure about the small sessions court. Will verify and then answer.
In history (that you reviewed earlier), there was an embedded comment on what was the exact cause of economic revival. I have expanded the line, but not deleted your comment, rather added my own embedded comment, as I am not sure if the point was adequately addressed. Similar comment is there in the economy section. Please see. Thanks a lot.--Dwaipayanc 20:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the review. Size has been reduced, thats good. I will search for the highest point. I was busy today so could not attend the points raised by your review. Hope will do on Sunday. At a glance, the copyedit seemed excellent, except one or two places where probably slight more info/less comment perhaps would have been better (an edit in economy seemed to almost indirectly point out Jyoti Basu for the decline of the city - may raise POV question, what do you think?). We'll discuss later. THANKS A LOT. --Dwaipayanc 18:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India FA

Oh yeah that's perfectly alrite. I'll ask you again after a month (PR will take that long). All the best with your work. Rama's Arrow 19:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

During the PR/FAC of Pakistan and Bangladesh, it was noted how comparatively India did not have in-line citations. Also, I find that the "history" and other sections in the India article need more information and to be better written. The India article's size is 32kb - roughly 10kb smaller than the Pakistan and Bangladesh articles. While it is good that the size is not too large, the information covered is not sufficient. I voted "Strong Keep" only because I agreed that without prior efforts to resolve problems, an article must not go to FARC. I'll help fix these issues of course. Rama's Arrow 19:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the FAs who were written before 2005 seem to have issues. Hinduism was recently pushed for FARC, as was Goa. Guurbrahma and I did many revisions to protect Mahatma Gandhi. I think there's a lot of upgrading necessary for old FAs. Rama's Arrow 19:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deciphering inotes

What does inote|tongues mean? Their are quite a few inotes like that in the India article. I dont understand how to make sense of inotes. I went to the inote discussion page but that was not very helpful either. --Blacksun 13:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the use of inotes should rather be discouraged, because the references are available only to the editors and not the readers. --Andy123(talk) 17:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks for helping me out. --Andy123(talk) 13:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to leave your comments on this page, according to your thoughts --Andy123(talk) 14:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I can trouble you for a little feedback

You are cordially invited to pick on Frank:
(Beats handling problems!<G>)
re: Request some 'peer review' (Talkpage sections detailing concerns)] on new article: Arsenal of Democracy This post is being made Friday 14 April 2006 to a double handful (spam?) of admins & editors for some reactions, and advice (Peer Review) on this article, and it's remaining development, as I'd like to put it to bed ASAP. (Drop in's welcome too!) Your advice would be valuable and appreciated. Replies on talk link (above) indicated. Thanks! FrankB 18:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page Protection Policy

Hi Nichalp,

I believe that the Page Protection Policy states that those pages that are frequented by vandal attacks or POV pushing. For this reason, the Main Page of Wikipedia is Protected. I find that the alternative main pages are not protected at all. Agreed that there haven't been instances of vandalism, but the danger is always there. What I want to say is that "Why take chances?" Someday or the other vandals will vandalize the page. I feel that it should at least be semi-protected. This wouldn't do any harm as the layout of Main Page isn't supposed to be experimented by inexperienced users. Also, I feel that there should be a link to Wikipedia:Main Page alternatives from somewhere in the Main Page itself. What do you think. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC) ==Inuse==--Dwaipayanc 13:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC) Oh yes, of course! Just add the inuse template.(Somebody else my come). I am doing the demographics (replying your isuues). Bye!--Dwaipayanc 07:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blink484 has redirected Kolkata to Calcutta, but has done so improperly. He did not properly move the archived talk pages, neither did he link properly to the on-going peer review. Please see this technical stuffs.

Plus, I think it was a consensus to keep the name Kolkata. So it will be better to have it as Kolkata. Though Calcutta is more readily recognizable! Bye.--Dwaipayanc 11:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Thanks a lot. Bye.--Dwaipayanc 13:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! That was an excellent summarisation. Just one point: Black Hole of Calcutta should have been mentioned...what do you think?--Dwaipayanc 16:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Ok I am removing the Battle of Plassey. Ar present I am addressing some of your embedded comments in the article: either removing those with comments in the article, or replying your commentsin embedded format. Check those out after 1 or 2 days. However, I am not being able to find out 2 citations. That Salt lake is the only planned city is proving to be difficult to find out. That is is a planned city can be cited. Do you think this claim can be contested? Does it really need citation? Also, the BSNL is largest telephone service provider (landline) is proving difficult to find out. Hope will get something! I am raking the liberty to remove your embedded comments once they seem to be satisfactorily addressed. Bye. Thanks a lot. Please do have a look at the lead. Tama's Arrow did nice edits though.--Dwaipayanc 19:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY EASTER !

thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}

Renames

Haha thanks :D — Ilyan e p (Talk) 14:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Closing your RFA

I really wany to be adminship and I've made up my mind. If you really want to delete, delete another nominee because I want to become an adminship. You either accept it or don't but please allow the ending vote day ,which is now April 26th, to come and then delete it. I love Wikipedia dearly and I just want to serve as an adminship. So please don't delete it. General Eisenhower 16:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutan

Hi Nichalp, I just wanted to inform you that some anon keeps reverting you changes at Bhutan. —Khoikhoi 17:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. —Khoikhoi 18:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVG Map

Just wanted to check the status. Could you upload a draft (without state borders)? - Ganeshk (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutan

Why are you reverting to your version from months back when tonnes of new information and edits have been added. YOu can't accept the fact that your version is not up there verbatim? Why don't you edit what's wrong instead of undoing everyone's changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Druksoogs (talk • contribs)

Hi! There's no need to be so hostile. Please remember the new additions have to be properly sourced and written. Your draft (though it may be correct) is guilty of the following criteria:

Lack of sources:
1. Data released by the Ministry of agriculture showed that the country had a forest cover of 64 percent as of October 2005.. -- Where can we find this data? Source needed
2. Roughly 20% percent of the population ... -- Source needed
3. An extensive census done in June of 2005 resulted in a further reduction of the population figure to 554,000. -- Source needed
Poor =History= section. The history section should be written in a summary. Instead it rambles on and on about Bhutan's immigrant problems. Move that to the History of Bhutan and summarise the same here.
Similarly details about archery in the culture section.
Dates should be unwikified
Metric units should gain a precendence over imperial units

I request you to take care of these problems to avoid the embarassment of getting the article listed for removal of its featured status. Else I'll have to make the necessary reversion in a week's time. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I guess I did jump the gun. I am going to try and make the citations. Druksoogs 19:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

There is an image up for deletion on Wikimedia commons which you had earlier uploaded. Click here to follow. Thanks --Andy123(talk) 16:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Many thanks for the note and for your discretion. I will endeavor to be worthy of it. Kaisershatner 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket

The Award image for Cricket is in the porcess of changing to Image:Cricket-barnstar-small.png per Updating Cricket Award per Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals. evrik 17:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments addressed except some problems

Hi! Your embedded comments have been addreseed in Kolkata. Almost all of them needed no change in the article, and I replied to your comments in embedded format. You can check out the comments. If you are satisfied, we'll delete the embedded comments from the article. The citations needed have been provided.

There is a major concern. Mother Teresa still remains almost unmentioned. The problem is where to mention on her activities? Is "History" ok? "Demographics" is not the best place.

Another point is the lead. A mention of the urbanisation problems of poverty, pollution, traffic — these should be mentioned in a line in the lead I guess. However, the body of the article touches poverty, but does not explicitely comments on the pollution and traffic congestion. While a stray comment on traffic can be added in the "transport" section, some data-based comment on pollution would be better for pollution, and that can be added in the "Climate". I am trying to find out some. After that, lead can be accordingly modified.

So, I need your help in properly adjusting the activities of Mother Teresa, and copyedit of the lead. Please check out the article when you have time. If you think the time is ripe, you can share with me the "tips" you told me!Bye. THANKS A LOT.--Dwaipayanc 17:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnah FAC

Hi - Jinnah is FAC. I decided to move on FAC becoz I believe that all remaining objective criticism will only be obtained there. I ask for your support and welcome all criticism. Rama's Arrow 15:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nichalp - is it possible for you to produce an audio pronunciation of Jinnah's name? It was requested on FAC, and I don't know who to ask except you. Rama's Arrow 16:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is mr t the simpleton there is a charles that is under paw called the holy roller type that has no right to come in my town of living.

"Out WIth The Old"

I am divorced over seven years and very happpy!I am married to the Lord in a set called Boopsies!I do not need the pranks is not pranks i am a c logman in a jam allan lamar is the culprit with denise and a chick up here named stacey who has fine legs.this is mr t. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.166.110.253 (talk • contribs)

Problem with Rani Mukerji page

There is an anonymous ip user and User:Shez 15 who are POV pushing on the article. They are making this page look like a fan page rather than an NPOV page on Wikipedia. Kindly check. --Andy123(talk) 05:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The anonIP is Shez. He alternates Shez and IP, perhaps to give himself more reverts. He is obsessed with Rani Mukerji. This has been going on for months. We could file an RFC, but (IMHO) it wouldn't make the slightest difference to his behavior -- he doesn't communicate with anyone. I don't know what to do. Zora 05:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Regards, --Andy123(talk) 06:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Nichalp. Let's see if this spurs him to start talking with us. Zora 06:47, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]