User talk:NicePrettyFlower

My start.

My account was made in June 21 2024. I wanted to talk on my page. And also wanted to edit mistakes if I find mistakes on a page. I also wanted to read articles. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I am interested in.

I am interested in geography. I also am interested in history. I am also interested in the Internet. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 22:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to read articles about my interests. I would like to make an article one day.

Why I was named that.

I gave it that name because I thought it was a good name to give. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 22:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating an article.

I am creating an article about a film that is a knock off of DreamsWork's Kung Fu Panda called Chop Kick Panda. It is still being held for review, but they think there is no sourced material, but I actually added links to the reference section since I am new to creating Wikipedia articles and don't know that much how to add referenced material. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It got declined, but I resubmited it, and still being held for review. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 21:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh all of them got declined now. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chop Kick Panda (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chop Kick Panda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 21:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NicePrettyFlower! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 21:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chop Kick Panda (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chop Kick Panda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to, but I don't understand that much about referenced material because I am new to adding referenced material on Wikipedia. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chop Kick Panda (November 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There are manu hundreds of these cheap knock-off films; with very few exceptions practically none are notable enough for Wikipedia.

CoconutOctopus talk 21:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are actually an article I know of that is about a knock off film called The Little Panda Fighter, so it seems to me to make an article about another knock off film I know of, @CoconutOctopus . NicePrettyFlower (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that article is notable enough to be included either, to be honest. CoconutOctopus talk 10:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me understand. NicePrettyFlower (talk) 16:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]