User talk:Niazim1

Welcome

Hello, Niazim1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Them From Space 17:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Complex Adaptive Communication Networks

The article Complex Adaptive Communication Networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

"Newly emerging" is an admission that the subject may not (yet) be notable enough for a general encyclopedia so I will let the AfD discussion for complex adaptive communication network run its course. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact, I disagree with that comment because of the well-known fact in the academia (Universities/Professors) that there are numerous Journal and conference papers on this area shows the area is well-developed however by emerging, it means it is perhaps not more than 5+ years old in terms of research. Assuming you are conversant with Academic Journal publishing, it takes several years before a single academic paper gets from initial work to publication in any Journal of high standing. Paper first goes through a proper peer-review of several months to perhaps an year and then issues are decided and so on. I would definitely like you to kindly disprove me if you have any solid evidence from academic publishing to contradict this statement. Thanks. I am sorry to say that I now understand why one important reason why sites such as Wikipedia are not regarded as a primary reference in academic journals is perhaps uninformed statements such as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niazim1 (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia insists that it is not a primary reference. We reject anything that falls into that category. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been massively edited and as I had said earlier, I was going to add all the references in time. It no longer reflects any single person's papers. Please review again and if you agree, you should change the AfD comment as that is not very polite, and an incorrect accusation (See my explanation above).

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Computation. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zidanie5 (talk) 11:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for the edit/comments. Here are my replies:

A. I am afraid, I would not agree about notability. See, in notability guidelines for Journals, a Journal is notable since it is indexed in a large number of Bibliometric Indices. This one is indexed by a large number of databases including Thomson Reuters Master List, who release the yearly JCR Impact factor. Once a journal is indexed, exactly one year from the indexing date, the journal is given an impact factor. B. The text was not meant to be promotional. Actually I copied-pasted the Journal scope from Springer's website introducing the Journal and give its original link. Can you kindly go to the site and verify yourself? Thanks.

Here is the actual words from Notability guidelines: "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major indexing services in its field. Examples of such services are Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Scopus.". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academic_journals)

As such, this journal is listed in the Science Citation Index.

C. Incidentally, my source for the Journal infobox was another Journal article page that I had started earlier and was accepted. Please see Wiley-Blackwell's European Transactions on Telecommunications Page. :)

Thanks so much for the time anyways,

Cheers

Hello, yes, I agree about the fact that the subject of your article is probably notable. Probably I clicked the wrong item in the scroll down window with reasons for declining, because there are three other problems with the article:

as it stands, the article is a copyright violation of the page you linked (the official website); you see, unless the page states a copyright license compatible with Wikipedia, it is presumed as "all rights reserved", and cannot be used in Wikipedia!
Most of it is unreferenced (for example, where can a reader verify that it is actually indexed in the mentioned journals?)
As I said in the Comment, it is very promotional in its tone, and not suitable for an encyclopedia

That said, I admit I used the wrong reason for declining and I apologise for that. Please feel free to improve the article (rephrase and use an encyclopedic tone, neutral point of view) and resubmit for review. Zidanie5 (talk) 06:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks so much for the reply. I am a newbie here so definitely appreciate your advice. I shall check out the links.

Cheers

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Computation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Computation, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Cognitive Computation

Hello Niazim1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Cognitive Computation.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Computation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Cognitive Computation was accepted

Cognitive Computation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cognitive Computation

The article Cognitive Computation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]