User talk:NiallJones

Speedy deletion of Niall Jones

A tag has been placed on Niall Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chemistrygeek (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Niall Jones

A tag has been placed on Niall Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chemistrygeek (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Grand Theft Auto (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Grand Theft Auto (series). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please stop your disruptive edits, such as the two you made to God. If you continue to make such edits you will be blocked. Hadrian89 (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Universe. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Old Moonraker (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eggo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eggo was changed by NiallJones (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-03T09:30:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Jodie Kidd constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 14:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sky Sports. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [[ axg ⁞⁞ talk ]] 14:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wet Trout

		The Wet Trout Award
		I, TitanOne (talk), have the honor of presenting NiallJones the Wet Trout Award for one of the most humorous edits I've ever seen done on Wikipedia.