User talk:Nguyenquochieu2107

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Teen USA. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC) blocked from editing[reply]

Ways to improve Angola at major beauty pageants

blocked from editing blocked from editing Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Nguyenquochieu2107, WARNING for creating HOAX INFORMATION Angola at major beauty pageants!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve the page, if possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing of articles related to pageants

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 16:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Texas at Miss USA and Miss Teen USA

The article Texas at Miss USA and Miss Teen USA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary synthesis, topic is covered adequately at Miss Texas USA and Miss Texas Teen USA. This amounts to little more than fancruft & original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 15:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop adding these sections either to existing articles or as new articles. They are an unnecessary duplication of information and do not comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 16:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Miss Alaska USA while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 03:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2018 issue

Your recent editing history at Miss Universe 2018 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I have explained my reasoning at the article talk page, I would encourage you to discuss the issue further there. ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 03:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this section go an fix ALL THE HEIGHTS that are inconsistent with what Miss Universe webiste says, you are the one that wanted to keep the height on there now all the heights are not consistent with Miss Universe website. Go through every single contestant and fix their height. Art 281 (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I went ahead and removed the height information on the contestants of Miss Universe 2018. There was numerous of wrong heights that didn't match the Miss Universe website. This is why the heigh column is not used anymore on beauty pageant pages. They are not reliable Art 281 (talk) 21:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation notification

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar. Thank you. Jamez42 (talk) 02:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nguyenquochieu2107. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Indonesia at major beauty pageants. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:13, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nguyenquochieu2107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

They have tried to block me although they are wrong. They created many account and some of which has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sock puppet of User:DeanBWFofficial such as User:DPIDAMU, User:KevinLilliana. Last time User:GorillaWarfare helped me to prevent them but now they change again. I'm so sorry because my English language skills is limited. Please help me to prevent them.

Accept reason:

See below. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: Dear administrator, I promise I will not engage in an edit war even if you believe you are right. If I am engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, I will discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensuswith them. I also will read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.

Nguyenquochieu2107, you can go over WP:3RR if you are reverting a sock, just make it clear that you are doing so, i.e leave an edit summary like "revert sock of Deanarthurl" Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and as Ivanvector said below, repeatedly reverting is not the best way to deal with socking; better is to report the account and get the account blocked for socking. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanvector, the account they've been reverting has indeed been confirmed as a sock. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Galobtter: fair enough. Nguyenquochieu2107: in the future, if you suspect another account is a sockpuppet (even if you're sure they are) please do not edit war with them. Please file a report at WP:SPI or notify an administrator at WP:ANI or on an admin's talk page. If you just start reverting, someone like me who doesn't know what's going on is going to block you again. If you have any questions about this please feel free to ask. I have unblocked your account. Take care. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: @Galobtter: thank you so much.

Thanks for recognizing the sockpuppetry of Special:Contributions/Globalbeauties, but as I and Ivan said to you, you should also report the sock so that it gets blocked. If you don't know how to file an SPI (which can be done pretty easily with twinkle) just leave me a message and I'll sort it out. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Philippines at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing. Unsubstantiated removal of sourced entry from third party reliable sources. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss World 1995, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¿Classifications in Miss USA?

Why erase the info?. It's important --Mauriziok (talk) 12:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Switzerland at major beauty pageants

Is it fair to assume that Switzerland at major beauty pageants started as an unattributed copy-paste from Draft:Switzerland at major beauty pageants? Courtesy ping T4mb4y 22, creator of the latter. Sam Sailor 07:39, 5 May 2019 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss USA 2009, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kristen Dalton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe and flags in infoboxes

Hi. I saw at this edit that you had restored a flag to the infobox that I had previously removed. Please be aware that per WP:INFOBOXFLAG, we generally do not use flags as you have done here. I am re-removing the flag per that guideline. If you have questions about this, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Triila73

Hello, there is a discussion at the talk page of Miss Universe 2019 and you're invited to participate. Thank you. Triila73 (talk) 00:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Canada 2019, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages East Coast and Atlantic Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rečane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the 3rd and 4th runner-up

why did you remove in miss universe 3rd and 4th runners-up but please answer to me??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.9.111.159 (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bea Patricia Magtanong on the Miss International 2019 article

Hello, Nguyenquochieu2107

I have reverted your edit on Bea Patricia Magtanong's name on the Miss International 2019 page/aticle, and provided her complete name. Her name is "Bea Patricia Magtanong," and although her first given name is "Bea," she is popularly known as "Patricia" or "Patch" Magtanong, so there isn't any reason why her full name shouldn't be included. Take for example Meghan Markle, who is known by that name and not through her first name "Rachel." Please refrain from re-editing if your reason is that she has a page of her own, which is invalid a reason. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Philippines at major beauty pageants. Do not revert established name, Bea Patricia Magtanong. Her article on Wikipedia is Bea Patricia de Guzman Magtanong, including her matronymic surname "De Guzman," and her name in international format (given name/s and surname) is "Bea Patricia Magtanong," not "Bea" or "Patricia" alone, as she is not even known by those names popularly, but as "Patch Magtanong," hence, to observe consistency of format on Wikipedia, we use Bea Patricia Magtanong. This is your last warning. Migsmigss (talk) 13:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss International 2019, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Please refrain from removing and blanking maintenance templates without valid reason, and especially without supplementing reliable sources so the template(s) could be removed. This is a warning. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"By the end" over "at the end'"

Hello. "By the end" is more appropriate than "at the end" as the former means an event should have already happened before the end of the show, which is the case for coronations in pageantry. Coronations are not the final segment, as the winner is usually asked to do her first walk, asked a question or perform a speech, after the coronation; in some cases, the host(s) of the show also closes the event.

Also, please refrain from replying with un-called for comments, such as your comment "You need to learn more grammar" which is rather improper. This serves as a first warning on this topic for you. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Philippines at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing. Migsmigss (talk) 08:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Venezuela at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Refrain from deleting sources/references in articles, as you did so here. Continue doing so, despite several warnings, and this will be escalated to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Sources and references are important in developing Wikipedia articles; they are the soul of Wikipedia. Removing/deleting sources/references without explanation or any valid reason is simply unacceptable. This is your first and final warning on this acitivity. Migsmigss (talk) 09:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Philippines at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continue replacing color schemes without valid reason, and I will have to escalate your activity to incidents' noticeboard. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Venezuela 2016, you may be blocked from editing. Migsmigss (talk) 07:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Venezuela 2018. Migsmigss (talk) 07:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Venezuela 2019, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Migsmigss (talk) 07:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Venezuela at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continue deleting table contents without valid reason and I would have to escalate your activity for admin's attention via the incidents noticeboard. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Venezuela 2018, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Migsmigss (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Australia at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Migsmigss (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Philippines at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Migsmigss (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Color Keys

The color keys are needed for countries that have won in all four pageant competitions: Venezuela, Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Brazil, since there are color keys for the runners-up, finalists, and semifinalists, there should be a clear color key indicating the winners from these competitions from these four countries. Do not generalize content format; these four countries need the additional color keys as they have produced winners across the board, in all four pageants.

A principle of Wikipedia is to broaden and expand articles, as well as facilitate easy reading and use for users, especially the new ones. Why would you disallow a color key indicator system that would facilitate these?

I have tried reasoning and discussing with you to no avail. I have raised these concerns to incidents' noticeboard and edit warring resolution, since you have continuously insisted on your edits without valid reason nor RS.

Migsmigss (talk) 06:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nguyenquochieu2107 reported by User:Migsmigss (Result: ). Thank you. Migsmigss (talk) 06:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! There was also a case filed against you at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, which I responded to. As I said there, I am declining administrative action at this time. However, edit warring is unacceptable. You need to discuss the colour coding on the talk page of either the article or WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants, since this is a matter that may warrant standardization across the projects. Any further edit warring could result in page protection or a partial block of the offending editors' accounts. —C.Fred (talk) 14:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Venezuela at major beauty pageants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Migsmigss (talk) 06:54, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 2006, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2017, Please stop your disruptive editing of articles related to pageants

Please stop your disruptive editing as you did on Miss Universe 2017.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Lukewon (talk) 14:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Universe 2017, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Lukewon (talk) 07:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Miss Universe 2017".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

- Bri.public (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am nightenbelle- a mediator on the WP:DRN. I am copying a message here explaining why the dispute you are involved in was closed. I want you to be informed that I will be watching the article and the talk page and any further edit warring or non-assumptions of good faith will result in those involved brought to the WP:ANI. You need to stop edit waring and engage in discussion.

I'm closing this because the discussion on the talk page hasn't really been a discussion. One of the editors reverting has refused to engage on the talk page, so there is no reason to believe they would engage here. Also- While two sources have been provided for the inclusion of the material.... there are also WP:RS that support another candidate having won this award that year, [1] and this seems to be a behavior issue in that the editors are having a slow edit war rather than discuss on the talk page. So- I'm going to do this instead- Lukewon (talk · contribs) and Nguyenquochieu2107 (talk · contribs) both of you are to stop making accusations in your edit summaries and on the talk page, both of you are to start discussing your reasons and sources on the talk page- and neither of you are to edit the article until you reach a decision. IF after YOU BOTH engage on the talk page- you still can't find a solution, you may return here, or open an WP:3o OR WP:RFC any of the three- pick the one you think most appropriate. However, if you continue to revert without discussion- I will take this to the ANI because it will become a behavior issue if you don't start discussing the issue rather than a slow edit war. Nightenbelle (talk) 11:19 am, Today (UTC−5)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively ignoring community concerns voiced at Talk:Miss Universe 2017 and here on this page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]