User talk:Nexusadams

Welcome!

Hello, Nexusadams, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! KyloRen3 (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakravyuh – An Inspector Virkar Crime Thriller has been accepted

Chakravyuh – An Inspector Virkar Crime Thriller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bennv3771 (talk) 09:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nexusadams, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nexusadams! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cubicles (web series) (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source #1: Interview (Does not count towards being notable)

Source #2: Top 20 List (Does not count towards being notable) Source #3: Appears to be user-generated content (Does not count towards being notable) Source #4: (Notable source 1/3)

Source #5: Gossip column (Does not count towards being notable)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cubicles (web series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cubicles (web series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 17:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeet Ki Zidd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeet Ki Zidd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, Nexusadams, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Editzzzluther per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editzzzluther. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nexusadams (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I would like to clarify that I have no ties with the individual "Editzzzluther" who's under investigation. I watch a lot of Indian web series and hence have done multiple edits in the same genre. I agree that I made a draft: Bicchoo Ka Khel which had been deleted earlier, however my draft is completely different and unbiased. I assumed that the web series requires a Wikipedia page because it has already been released and has ample notability. Thought of creating the page as the web series is included in the official web series list of the parent organization.

I'm sorry if this has led to any wrongdoing as I'm fairly new to the Wikipedia ecosystem. This, I believe is an unfortunate coincidences and I appeal you to please exonerate me from the ban so that I can make productive contributions henceforth. I would like to consider this as a stringent warning Nexusadams (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see how you could possibly know that the draft you created at Draft:Bicchoo Ka Khel was significantly different from prior deleted versions of the article unless you were collaborating with the editors of that page, given that that article was most recently deleted nearly 3 months before this account started editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bicchoo Ka Khel moved to draftspace

I've moved Bicchoo Ka Khel back to draft space. If you think it's ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page, and then wait for an experienced reviewer to decide whether or not it should have a place in the encyclopaedia. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nexusadams, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bicchoo Ka Khel has been accepted

Bicchoo Ka Khel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.