User talk:Newzealand123

Please refrain from removing speedy deletion templates from the article page. You may contest the deletion by placing your rationale on the corresponding talk page. Please wait for an administrator to review the deletion. Thanks. -SFK2 (talk) 12:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Why not write about something else? Have a look at Category:Security companies and see if you can improve some our existing articles —SMALL JIM 13:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Home Security

Hello Newzealand123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Home Security for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Business Security

Hello Newzealand123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Business Security for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent advertising/spamming. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SMALL JIM 13:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newzealand123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not trying to advertise on wikipedia. I asked for help and for someone to remove what they thought was advertising in the article. Can you please unblock me and let me rewrite it then review it again and delete anything that wikipedia considers spam?

Decline reason:

If after you have made edits which you believe "removed anything that could be considered advertising", you can leave an article packed full of such blatant marketing-speak as "... brings the latest CCTV & Alarm systems that have been sourced from high quality manufacturers. From the casing to the camera lens, they ensure all homes and businesses are receiving the best home security packages on the market" and "... is one of the most trusted home and business security companies in Australia and has many high profile clients such as Coca-Cola, Vodafone, Hungry Jack's and Nando's", then it is very difficult to believe that you will ever be able to edit in the neutral way required for Wikipedia. (I can only guess that you work in advertising/marketing/PR/Whatever-else-you-like-to-call-it, and are so used to reading and writing marketing-speak all day that you have become desensitised to it, and can't see it when it is right in front of you.) I understand your point about other editors editing your contributions, but unblocking an editor who is likely to write whole pages of unadulterated promotional prose, and expecting others to then put time and work into checking it all out and editing to make it acceptable, would not be helpful to the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: I wouldn't dispute a decision to unblock if you are persuaded that the editor would return to contributing constructively. —SMALL JIM 13:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to blocked user: To avoid your article being deleted while you are working on it, you can go to articles for creation after you are unblocked. Articles for creation is a place where articles are reviewed for issues, including spam, before they go "live." Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 06:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]