User talk:Newtwowiki

Re:Buffalo, New York

The reason that I reverted the edit is this. While the information about the demographic change is relevant to the article, the way it is presented sounds more like an opinion (Example - cannot be taken lightly). A statement like that should be referenced if it's a quote or stated on the talk page.Shinerunner (talk) 10:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know how the heck Wiki's 'talk' thing works, I hope you see this. I see; I replaced the portion you sighted with more neutral language, I hope it is more suitable. Thanks Newtwowiki (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message. Just that statement was my concern. If you look at the previous edits to the Buffalo, New York article, you'll see that a few editors have tried to insert some personal negative comments about the city and the page is plagued by vandalism. Sorry if it seems like I over reacted. Shinerunner (talk) 23:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. If you look at the recent history record, you'll see I've made many improvements to the page. Newtwowiki (talk) 02:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]