User talk:NewtonRam

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

NewtonRam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27113 was submitted on Oct 12, 2019 23:24:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

331dot (talk) 23:50, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NewtonRam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I just got a Wikipedia account this afternoon. I am trying to create an article on my teacher, who was a renowned musician. This is the year of her birth centenary. My son Superbrickbro was helping me by showing me how to cite references properly but we accidentally copied a whole page instead of citing the link and hit publish. There was no mis-intent or sock puppetry used but we could not explain this to the editor as my account and our IP got blocked. Can you please excuse this error and unblock my accounts? We were not trying to use sock puppetry as one account is my son’s (superbrickbro) and the other is mine (NewtonRam). Thank you for understanding and greatly appreciate your help.NewtonRam (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)NewtonRam[reply]

Decline reason:

You've outright admitted to sockpuppetry here; see WP:MEAT. You've also admitted to violations of WP:COI. You will therefore not be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NewtonRam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I appreciate that it looks like sock puppetry but all I was trying to explain is what happened given my very limited experience with Wikipedia, rather than get support from my family. I literally opened this account last evening and have been blocked as soon as I attempted to put a sentence on the draft page. Also, the musician that I learned from was neither my family, friend or employer, just someone renowned as an expert. If this represents a COI,I am glad to remove my edits as I have no intent apart from contributing information to the encyclopedia. Is there any way that I can get unblocked? Do I need to delete my edits on the page I was adding to? If so, that is fine and I just need some guidance on what needs to happen. Thank you. NewtonRam (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)NewtonRam[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, Do I need to delete this account? It looks like we cannot have multiple accounts on the same IP address and I can do this to help resolve this situation and keep just one unblocked account. Please let me know. thank youNewtonRam (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)NewtonRam[reply]

I've changed your second unblock request to a comment - only one request at a time is needed. Secondly, accounts cannot be deleted. SQL ^{Query me!} 15:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]