User talk:Newpritam dutta

September 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Maliner (talk) 16:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 64andtim were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Signed, 64andtim (any problems?) 18:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Newpritam dutta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Signed, 64andtim (any problems?) 18:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt this high school student is notable by our criteria

[1]. Doug Weller talk 19:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CAN WE MAKE ANOTHER PAGE FOR THEM

OR LEAVE THEM Newpritam dutta (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, we can’t. Doug Weller talk 20:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newpritam dutta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me as I will never use multiple account from now and only do legitimate edits and contributions. Please just unblock me for this time.

Decline reason:

I see no benefit to the project by doing so. Yamla (talk) 10:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newpritam dutta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for my previous actions that led to my block from editing Wikipedia. I was new to Wikipedia at the time and was unaware that creating multiple accounts is against Wikipedia's policies. I am genuinely interested in contributing to Wikipedia in a positive and constructive manner and would be grateful if you would reconsider my block and allow me to resume editing.

Decline reason:

This is little difference between this and your prior request. Please read the unblock appeals guide to learn how to craft a request likely to be accepted. 331dot (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newpritam dutta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal my block from editing Wikipedia and request your reconsideration. I sincerely apologize for my prior actions, specifically, the creation of multiple accounts, which led to my block.

Having carefully reviewed the unblock appeals guide, I understand the importance of providing a clear and compelling appeal. Since my last request, I have taken the following steps to address the concerns raised:

1. I have thoroughly familiarize myself with Wikipedia's policies, particularly those related to the creation of multiple accounts, to ensure a better understanding. 2. I have participated in discussions on Wikipedia talk pages to gain insights into community expectations and guidelines. 3. I am committed to contributing positively to Wikipedia, specifically in science and technology.

I fully recognize the gravity of my mistake and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies moving forward. I am genuinely interested in contributing constructively and positively to the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my appeal. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not considered. GPTZero score: 96%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.