User talk:Newjackswingeditor

Welcome!

Hello, Newjackswingeditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Policy Reformer (c) 13:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dlive22891 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome, Newjackswingeditor. We appreciate your efforts to create an article for Dlive22891 - regrettably, this person does not appear to be notable enough to be worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia.

Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia. We consider evidence from reliable and independent sources to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article.

Try checking out Wikipedia:Your first article for advice on how to create an article on Wikipedia. As well, you might find Wikipedia's guidance for younger editors to be useful. Thanks again, and welcome aboard! --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newjackswingeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn’t do anything. I didn’t vandalize or disrupt Wikipedia! Can you please unblock me! Newjackswingeditor (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You're obviously a sock puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a sockpuppet man! Newjackswingeditor (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it takes for me to be blocked and how I supposed to be unblock how! Newjackswingeditor (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone unblock me Newjackswingeditor (talk) 00:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please! Unblock Me! Newjackswingeditor (talk) 00:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newjackswingeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look I should’ve stop editing from danger or is been dangerous editing or sockpuppetry like other bad users , who has been editing from danger. I will not editing Wikipedia from danger. Newjackswingeditor (talk) 00:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That makes no sense. Regardless, checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can someone unblock me please! Newjackswingeditor (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If don’t than Harold Slikk will Beat You Up! Newjackswingeditor (talk) 11:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newjackswingeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use these accounts but they were not used abusively. It’s like having fun on Wikipedia like users did.

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for physical threats of violence. Yamla (talk) 11:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.