User talk:Newcomer64

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Marlon Brando has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Marlon Brando was changed by Newcomer64 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874204 on 2016-06-18T16:36:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newcomer64, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Newcomer64! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mae West has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mae West was changed by Newcomer64 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937391 on 2016-06-27T02:46:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Welcome to Willits

The article Welcome to Willits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON, and be an issue of WP:PROMO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 03:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hello. I noticed that you've added several reviews and citations to reception sections. Thank you for taking the time to do that. One other thing I noticed, though, is that your citations are malformed. You shouldn't any formatting to bare URLs. For example, to add a citation to example.com, you'd use this format: <ref>http://www.example.com/</ref>, not <ref>{{http://www.example.com/}}</ref>. When you do it the way you've been doing it, the citations can't be clicked. An even better solution, if you're willing to take the time, is to use citation templates, such as {{cite web}}. These add more information to the citation and help prevent link rot. Or you could use something like reFill to fill in the information automatically for you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to John Holmes (actor), you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Newcomer64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]