User talk:Newchaz64

Hello, Newchaz64, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.

It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it, to see if your idea has already been discussed. Even then, it is often helpful to suggest a major change before making it, to see if anyone objects or wants to discuss it. Please do not delete materials on other people's talk pages or on the talk pages of articles.

When you contribute to a talk page, please sign your name using four tildes: ~ ~ ~ ~ but without the spaces.

Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Johnny Appleweed

Message posted on Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Johnny Appleweed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.Appleweed.com in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Johnny Appleweed with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Johnny Appleweed with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Johnny Appleweed saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

172.131.193.244 14:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Nervous Set

The Nervous Set is very far from an encyclopedic article. IN particular is is not written from a neutral point of view - it has an opinion, and wikipedia articles should not have opinions. It's also badly organised and overlong. Simply dumping great screeds of other people's text does not an article make. And if you have got permission to use this text, you urgently need to follow the instructions above, about mailing "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org" or the whole article will likely be deleted as a copyright violation.

Please spend some time getting your head around what an encyclopedia article is, and try to get this one to a more reasonable standard. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Nervous Set

I have nominated The Nervous Set, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nervous Set. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tagishsimon (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Tagishsimon (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest

Could I draw your attention to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You clearly[1] have a conflict of interest in all of the work you have to date done on wikipedia. I should be grateful if you would now abide by wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest and, in particular, refrain from editing articles for which a conflict of interest arises. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Scott Miller (writer, director)

I have nominated Scott Miller (writer, director), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Miller (writer, director). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Tagishsimon (talk) 00:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you added the article some 5 days after I advised you of COI policy. That's a very arrogant & misguided action on your part. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continued COI

Scott, why do you consider that WP:COI does not apply to you? have the common courtesy to abide by our guidelines, please. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article comes entireloy from objective third-party sources, all noted. Newchaz64 (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are so missing the point that I'm amazed you can cross the road without being knocked down. Go and read my most recent comments on talk:New Line Theatre. If you cannot understand that cherrypicking favourable comment does not a balanced article make, then there really is no future for you on wikipedia. This is elementary stuff; it is surely well within your capacity to read WP:COI, understand it, and abide by it. So tell me again, Scott: why do you think that WP:COI does not apply to you? --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Johnny Appleweed

I have nominated Johnny Appleweed, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Appleweed. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tagishsimon (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Miller, or whoever you are, I would love for there to be articles in Wikipedia about these musicals, but you cannot just cut and paste from your website. A wikipedia article about a musical should be written and organized following the Wikipedia Manual of Style: See WP:MOS and following the WP:MUSICALS guidelines: Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre/Article Structure. In brief, there should be a short introduction stating who the author and composer are and giving a sentence or two about the story and major productions. Then there should be a background section explaining the genesis of the musical and its history prior to its major productions. Then a plot summary. Then a more detailed description of the major productions, including information about directors, choreographers and notable performers. Then critical reception and analysis sections. Then a list of awards. All of this, except the plot summary, should be supported with references to published secondary sources, not just the playwright's own website. See Hair (musical) for an example. I hope you decide to rewrite the article into an acceptable encyclopedia article. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Cry-Baby (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hairspray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Culture of St. Louis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Original Broadway poster art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Original Broadway poster art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this image of the show poster because the article had only the CD cover, but someone has undone my change, not sure why -- and that's why the image is currently being unused... Newchaz64 (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunday in the Park original poster art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunday in the Park original poster art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hands on a Hardbody (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theatre Under the Stars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Newchaz64. You have new messages at JaGa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sunday in the Park original poster art.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sunday in the Park original poster art.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (vent) @ 21:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Newchaz64. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL

Please see WP:CRYSTAL. Readings of new shows and adaptations are rarely of encyclopedic interest. Generally, you should wait until the show is produced in a fully-staged production by a professional theatre company before writing about it. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am baffled by this -- a professional theatre company has announced both a reading AND a fully staged production of this new adaptation of Pirates of Penzance -- announced in local AND national press -- but this can't be listed in the Adaptations section of the Pirates of Penzance wiki page...??? First I was told by an editor that it needed an "independent source," so I provided that. Now I'm told only fully staged productions by professional theatre companies are able to be listed, but this will be a fully staged production by a professional theatre company. I don't see the problem. Can you help me with this? -- Newchaz64 (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Newchaz64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Newchaz64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]