User talk:Newbiepedian/wip/Wikipedia:WikiPolice

Rejected?

Should this be tagged with rejected now, or should we wait for more mockery? Hipocrite (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a bit soon to mark it as rejected, but I certainly see this as taking an analogy too far. Also the "Board of supervisors" reminds me a bit of what got Wikipedia:Esperanza disbanded and deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of being sarcastic, you could try to be helpful and offer some feedback... ...but I presume you've never heard of constructive criticism, no?--Newbiepedian

12:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you mean by "constructive criticism". Let's say someone tries to build a nuclear power station in a wildlife sanctuary, without a planning permit. What would be constructive criticism in this case? Hans Adler 12:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how about you tell us what other accounts you've used to edit Wikipedia? We can't very well have a sockpuppet as Police Superintendent, now can we? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot about uniforms, medals, and an anthem. We should relabel Checkuser as 'Wikipedia Stasi', ArbCom as the Central Committee, and Jimbo as General Secretary. Here's some images that TYPO could use: http://www.underfoule.net/uf/src/124999932843.jpg, http://img.kyon.pl/static/img/remiq.net_5481.jpg. Fences&Windows 13:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What problem is this supposed to solve? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]