User talk:Newarkhistory

Hi Newarkhistory! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Emily Miles

Hey! I just accepted your article at Articles for creation. The official notification went to an IP, but I figured I'd let you know since you've added most of the content and it looks like the IP might be you logged out anyway. It's a great article! You may want to consider nominating it for a Did You Know hook, which is a way to allow new articles to be linked from the Main Page. Rusalkii (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eloise Alma Flagg has been accepted

Eloise Alma Flagg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 04:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil Dorrian has been accepted

Cecil Dorrian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 19:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alma E. Flagg

Hello, Newarkhistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alma E. Flagg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Mildred C. Crump, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Using non-rs social media links in an article. scope_creep^Talk 16:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mildred C. Crump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mildred C. Crump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mildred C. Crump (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 16:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alma E. Flagg

Hello, Newarkhistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alma E. Flagg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William R Jackson

Hello, Newarkhistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William R Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William R Jackson

Hello, Newarkhistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William R Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]