User talk:NewInnBee

Welcome

Hello, NewInnBee, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Zoohouse

Happy editing! Joel M. (talk) 22:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Weymouth F.C.. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Barret (talk) 21:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Weymouth F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Barret (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weymouth FC

Hello. Is there a reason why you have deleted this content [1] [2] [3] from the article? Could you at least provide an edit summary in the future or a notice on the article's talk page or else it could be seen as disruptive editing. Also when you are adding content such as this [4] please could you provide a reliable source (such as this BBC report for example) and refrain from using POV wording such as "A decision that left loyal fans very angry". Thank you. Barret (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MaloneyW.F.C for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Barret (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of MaloneyW.F.C (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NewInnBee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have edited the Weymouth F.C. page as up to date including a new under 18 team section i have no connection to who ever MaloneyW.F.C is. I as a local Weymouth FC fan am only here to help keep the page as up to date and as useful as possible to any reader so please can i have my right to editing back please i will help you if you need more information. Thanks NewInnBee.

Decline reason:

From the evidence it seems pretty likely that you are, but I'm not sure it even matters if you aren't. They were blocked for making the same types of edits you were making,and ignoring warnings and attempts at discussion just as you were doing. If that block was valid then this one is too regardless of whether you are really the same person. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.