User talk:New2018Year

February 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Trump, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is very constructive. See talk page. New2018Year (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you say "it is so so very true" that Trump primarily refers to Donald Trump, you shouldn't remove it from the "most commonly refers to" section. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I am going with the consensus, which is that the card game is #1. That is crazy but the consensus. Trump is tweeting nuclear war makes people think the card game is doing it. Crazy, I know. New2018Year (talk) 22:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to contact an editor, you're going to get a LOT further using their User_talk page, instead of user page. For example: User_talk:power~enwiki instead of User:power~enwiki. Typically, edits like this one will very likely end up being reverted, and not seen as the User: namespace is not intended for communication. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanction Advisement (American Politics)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 22:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I read this tag. I am not a sock puppet. Therefore, I should not be blocked. The internet is a cruel world so mostly likely I will not be unblocked. It is just like a Black man run over in the street. Nobody will stop. A few will yell racial slurs at the body. That is the way the internet is. Wikipedia is probably just like that. So sad. New2018Year (talk) 01:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really calling people racist now? You honestly think that's going to help your case? SQL ^{Query me!} 01:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The tone and general CIR issues (putting it politely) of this editor's posts are a close match to the master's. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NOT TRUE

NeilN blocked me forever saying in the block reason that I am a sockpuppet. I am not. This is a really unfriendly move by Wikipedia. New2018Year (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: New2018Year and AGrandeFan (talk · contribs · count) are Confirmed socks. Although Chris H of New York is Stale, based on CU logs, the two confirmed socks are Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Chris H of New York.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]