Jump to content

User talk:Neverquick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Smilesfozwood 23:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Development of religion

[edit]

Hi, you did not provide an explanation for your edit. Muntuwandi 18:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I need an explanation? I thought it was vandalism, so I reverted it. If I need to do anything else, tell me what I need to do, cause I'm pretty new here.--Neverquick 18:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was not vandalism, there is an active dispute regarding the content on the article. Muntuwandi 18:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the misconception. At least we can always revert everything.--Neverquick 18:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Cookies

[edit]

YEAH! COOKIES!!!!!! YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY!!!!!!!! Thank you so much Smilez, I thought I was going to starve! --Neverquick 15:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

[edit]
{{uw-vandalism2}}, removed.

Check my talk page, I've replied ;) Anthøny 19:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, man. --Neverquick 19:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bout the Febuary 24th I've been to the event and you havent so HA! ANd again...HA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddachieb6 (talkcontribs) 14:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

[edit]

I'm also sorry about me posting stuff a friend of mine was trying to be funny, it wont happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.222.52 (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its nothing to be worried about.--Neverquick (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the erroneous warning - it was a matter of me hitting the wrong VandalProof button. I reverted my edit as soon as I realized my mistake. Hope no offence was taken. CounterFX (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think nothing of it, sir or madam. I was not offended at all. I understand that these things happen (in fact, the whole reason for the warning being removed above was for that same reason.). Thank you for clearing things up so quickly.--Neverquick (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moeller High School

[edit]

I noticed that you'd reverted Moedude68's edits to Moeller High School. Thanks; however, "mythical" is actually the technical term for the high school football national championship, because the "championship" is actually a computer program, so it's entirely a myth. I didn't realize that until recently, either. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Thats weird. Thanks for informing me, I thought that was an odd description.--Neverquick (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TW

[edit]

I see you are using Twinkle my brother. Your revert counts shall ascend to the heavens. Smilesfozwood (talk) 15:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added rollback to your account too, for even faster reverting. Read WP:ROLL for appropriate uses of this feature. Cheers, NoSeptember 17:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Excellent job....

[edit]

I must say...you reverting that cigar article I vandalised was so quick it was unbelieveable, I came back on the page and my work was gone! Absolutely superb! With people like you around Wikipedia really is a great website. Keep it up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.83.155 (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! I thank you for actually saying something constructive, instead of vandalizing my page like someone else did. I'm not sure if this comment is pure sarcasm or praise, but both are welcome!--Neverquick (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need help figuring out what version to use

[edit]

Grand Palais was vandalized today along with Effiel Tower which you reverted. Please look at the user contributes. Looks like this one IP address has been vandalizing lots of different things recently. But I am to new here to figure out how to revert to the appropriate version since they pulled out different parts of the article at different points. Thanks C. Williams (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, someone else took care of it. Too new to figure out that mess any can not understand why someone else would want to deface wiki. Suppose you are used to it. shrug. My mother raised me better.  :) C. Williams (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I dod not respond quickly, I have some very pressing matters outside of Wikipedia. I'm happy that someone else gave you the help you needed. If you need anymore help, just ask any admin. I'm sure they'll give it to you.

Futurama

[edit]

You are an idiot: the original is of Jean-Jacques Perrey. Listen to it and don't tell shit! --88.64.91.102 (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be an idiot must be hard.
--88.64.91.102 (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If thats the case, I'm sorry. The name change seemed to drastic to have made any sense. If you had told me my error with a little bit of understanding, I would have been happy to correct it, but I must ask you not to insult editors. Thank you.--Neverquick (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohaithar

[edit]

Click on the "WILL" in "YOU WILL DIE" on your userpage and see what it links to :p — NovaDog(contribs) 02:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that when I made the page. I didn't know that articles where made for those words in CAPS at the time.--Neverquick (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fooled Barnstar

[edit]
The Fooled Barnstar
I award Neverquick the Fooled Barnstar because I, ComputerGuy890100, fooled you with my latest trick! ComputerGuy890100 02:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was late :P ComputerGuy890100 02:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, a barnstar to mark just how gullible I am...Oh well, it looks pretty!--Neverquick (talk) 03:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you too are having a bit of a problem with him/her. Basketball110 what famous people say 03:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that he has kept creating that page despite it being deleted every time. He's made them all rather quickly.--Neverquick (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyril P. Callister CSD

[edit]

Actually, he did invent Vegemite. I can add a few sources in a minute. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I thought it was nonsense. Good job spotting that on your part. The CSD tag can be removed.--Neverquick (talk) 03:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have to admit that it took a second all right :O). Tell you what, I'll add a few things to bring it up to a decent stub level in a few minutes. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 04:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure.--Neverquick (talk) 04:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oy... who would have thought that there was so much on the invention of Vegemite. Who would have thought that Vegemite has its own MySpace page? And who would have thought that I would doing anything about it as I have only eaten the damn stuff once and it was one time too many? :O) Australia owes me big time!FlowerpotmaN·(t) 06:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would never have guessed. I've never seen a can of it.--Neverquick (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


this is not right. Nowhere on Wikipedia does it say that I cannot quote a magizine. If you can fond that then I shall let it be deleted without a fight--Kingrock (talk) 05:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's a quote with attribution, I did not deem it infringing enough to delete it speedily. However, I have nominated it for deletion; discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DS PSP War. —C.Fred (talk) 13:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, my mistake. Sorry about that.--Neverquick (talk) 14:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy Deletion Criteria for Burnout Racing Team

[edit]

You see, its a fictional racing team that you never meet. Notice the fictional.--BRTman666 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

I redirected it to Burnout Paradise, because I don't see why it needs it's own article.--Neverquick (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you at least put something about it in the article? --BRTman666 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

That would be good, but I have never played the game, so I don't know what to write about.--Neverquick (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to worry, i shall do it. --BRTman666 (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

Great.--Neverquick (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :-) --BRTman666 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)BRTman666[reply]

its a npov edit

[edit]

this is an encyclopedia, right? if you dont use the word fictitious, it leads people to believe that black magic exists, which is fine, if you can source it from a source that most would consider verifiable (new york times?).76.67.56.106 (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out what I said on the articles talk page.--Neverquick (talk) 19:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

[edit]

I see you do a lot of vandal monitoring. I noticed that the user that van'd the Pixies page you reverted this morning does nothing but bad edits. Maybe it's already known? I'm fairly new. Mike Presson (talk) 17:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC) is that so? I'll have a look.--Neverquick (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't know where else to put this, and i'm not sure how to send messages, so here will do. I was sent a message saying i made a change in the vietnam war's page, yet, to be honest, i havent even looked at it, ever. Perhaps some knucklehead using my Wi-Fi, or even one of my PC's made the change, as for me, I didn't, sorry!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.3.143 (talk) 08:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be alarmed. It's likely that someone else used the IP to vandalize.--Neverquick (talk) 04:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


yea, i hate that thats what people do in their spare time is vandalize with other ip's

i used to revert vandalism/lies every chance i got, but i dunno, its a hassle, i give up after so much of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.9.99 (talk) 07:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Present for you!

[edit]

AfD nomination of Marcus Fenix

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Marcus Fenix, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Fenix. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ZeroGiga (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ha ha ha ha ha

[edit]

You make me laugh...--Buster7 (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

[edit]

Toner. Smilesfozwood (talk) 22:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I play a role in printing. Sup, Smiles.--Neverquick (talk) 01:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Squadala

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Squadala, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Squadala is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Squadala, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]