User talk:Nevborg

Welcome!

Hello, Nevborg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 03:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nevborg, are we related?

220 of ^Borg 03:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Malta

You're invited to join WikiProject Malta, where we are striving to assemble, update and categorize Malta related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the participants' section here.

Best regards, Xwejnusgozo (talk) 16:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Thanks, joined! Nevborg (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Dan għalik!

ToniSant (talk) 13:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are very happy for your participation in our challenge!

		Peace Treaties in Art 30 x 30 Challenge
		This badge is to show our gratitude for your remarkable contribution to the Peace Treaties in Art 30 x 30 Challenge. We hope you found the contest stimulating, eskerrik asko / thank you! Iñaki LL (talk) 11:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nevborg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki edit-a-thon on art in Malta, 3rd February 2017 - come say hello!

--Nevborg (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create list of pages edited:

Victor Pasmore
Gabriel Caruana
Mary de Piro
Antoine Camilleri
List of Maltese artists

Hi!

--Agata1288 (talk) 10:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :)

--Mcini2701 (talk) 10:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

--Donagt (talk) 10:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Just a kind reminder to create a page for Artist Frank Portelli. Thanks in advance[reply]

Hello

--Srtpscp (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HI !!!

--Mebej02 (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

--Theresa Vella (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

--Noel D'Anastas (talk) 10:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Working on Gabriel Caruana! Great!--Xabier Cañas (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

--Josanne Vella (talk) 10:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hey!

--Isabella Attard (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning

--Tidamizzi (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

--Ruby129 (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello

--Ritcassar (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

--Andreanne Seguna (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello hi

--Caliban70 (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

--Joejulian (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

--SarahChircop (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Hello!

--MariaGiuliana (talk) 16:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at FPM

Just popped in to thank you for accepting to guide us through the editing workshop at our FPM offices last Wednesday, 22 March :) Very useful information provided, which we hope to be able to put to good use! Keep up the good work! Giu.pri (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thanks for your help during the editting session yesterday! --MariaGiuliana (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :)

Thanks for the great session held on Wednesday 22nd March at the FPM offices! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigail.pace (talk • contribs) 17:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a very informative and useful Wikipedia edit-a-thon session ! All was very well explained and demonstrated

Francesca, Palazzo Falson 78.133.73.94 (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia session

Hello ! Thank you for all the useful informations about Wikipedia during the session of Wednesday 22nd March at the FPM offices! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herlet (talk • contribs) 07:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nevborg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: `@wikiwomeninred`

August and New Achievements at Women in Red

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90

An exciting new month for Women in Red!

August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!

For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nevborg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maltese artists

Hello :) I see that you added Category:Maltese artists to a number of articles about artists. However, all these articles are already categorized in subcategories of Category:Maltese artists (which is therefore a parent category), for example, Vincent Apap is categorized within Category:20th-century Maltese sculptors, which is itself in Category:20th-century Maltese artists, Category:Maltese artists by century and Category:Maltese artists. Therefore I think that adding the category leads to Wikipedia:Overcategorization, and therefore the category you added can be removed. What do you think on this matter? Xwejnusgozo (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Xwejnusgozo, thanks for pointing this out and apologies for seeing this and apologies for the late reply. I agree, I didn't realise that some of them were already classified - I just came across across a couple of pages that were classified either incorrectly or not at all and powered my way through slightly hastily. Please go ahead and revert the edits where necessary, otherwise I'll do it myself over the coming days. Thanks again! --Nevborg (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April Events

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117

Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:

New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance
Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers
Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman

Other ways you can participate:

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage
Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2014 European Parliament election in Malta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rebecca Cremona) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rebecca Cremona.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Some of the sources appear to be blogs, which are generally not reliable (see WP:BLOGS). Additionally, it's best to avoid citing sources that are directly affiliated with the subject.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Rosguill}} Thank you for your review, it is much appreciated. Could you kindly let me know which of the sources in the article are you referring to in your review, in order for me to find more suitable sources? I think the first source listed (Rock Productions), which I used to list the subject's academic qualifications, may be considered to be affiliated with the subject, but I'm not sure if there are any others in the article that are also considered generally not reliable. Thanks! --Nevborg (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Malta Scheduled Property Register

@Nevborg: I see that you are adding scheduled properties to the Malta "List of monuments in xxx" articles. Do you think these should be listed separately, eg. List of scheduled properties in Birkirkara for these, and List of monuments in Birkirkara for NICPMI? Listing both NICPMI and scheduled properties within the same list can create some problems due to duplicate listings - for example, many buildings in List of monuments in Birżebbuġa are now listed twice, such as "St George Redoubt" in NICPMI and "San Ġorġ Redoubt" with the scheduled properties. --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message @Xwejnusgozo:. Yes, it might be a good idea to separate them for the sake of clarity. The reason I was adding them now is that we (ToniSant and I) wanted to include them as eligible sites for the Wiki Loves Monuments competition that opens today. That's why I was integrating them into the same list, but you're right, this brings about an element of duplication.

For the time being I am uploading them manually from an Excel sheet that I have, but I'm trying to figure out an easier and quicker way to do it, as there are almost 800 scheduled sites - if you have any ideas on how this could be done more efficiently please do let me know, it would be hugely appreciated! --Nevborg (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In my humble opinion, clearly showing that the monuments appear on separate official lists is useful. However, I think that it's equally useful to have a single list of monuments in any given town or village, regardless which official list they're on. Indicating the list as a source for verifiable (i.e. a citation) should be enough. Duplicates create a good opportunity to reconsider how we list things. Ontologically, monuments are arguably notable by their very existence and not simply because they appear on an official list. Listing confirms formal/official recognition for the type of protection the monument requires or affords.

One simple question at the heart of all this: are "scheduled properties" also monuments? By Wiki Loves Monuments' definition of monuments the answer would seem to be yes.

Anyway, I believe that given the present requirement for Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, the important thing is they're somehow listed. We can always make adjustments to the list later, particularly if there are strong feelings by the community towards going one way or another. --ToniSant (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've thought about this some more and we definitely need to find a better way to handle duplicate entries on the list of monuments for any given location. I'm not sure we need to have two separate pages for each location. We need to find a way to indicate easily that a monument is on both lists within the existing table. Perhaps all that's required is a modification, or some simple editing, ensuring that the ID from each list is captured against a single entry rather than split over two entries. It should also be noted that while the NICPMI ID correspond to the official list, the other official list does not have uniqie ID numbers but these have been created for the wiki.

Ultimately, I believe that this is something we should be doing through Wikidata rather than just manually on Wikipedia, even if there are fellow Wikipedians who may frown on Wikidata integration. If we're to go in this direction, we need to find someone who can gives us significant input on setting an appropriate template in place and then we can simply populate all the monuments in the various towns and villages this way. I'd gladly organize an online workshop around that later on this month. --ToniSant (talk) 08:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nevborg and ToniSant: I agree that adding the scheduled properties to the existing lists may be the best option with WLM occurring right now. Perhaps in the future the template can be edited to include the "ID" column for NICPMI listings as well as a "Grade" column for scheduled buildings (the latter can be something along the lines of the table in this example). I'm not aware of any easy way to input these other than manual edits (which I agree can be tedious and time-consuming), but I'm not particularly proficient with using Wikidata so I don't really know. --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Xwejnusgozo: I agree, that would be a good solution, especially if we manage to obtain a more comprehensive list of properties (at the moment I only have Grade 1 scheduled properties). For the time being, I will continue adding to the existing lists then we can get to work on amending the tables to clarify the ID issue and eliminate any duplicates. --Nevborg (talk) 11:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]