User talk:Neutralityman

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Neutralityman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

162.90.96.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Nricardo". The reason given for Nricardo's block is: "Incivility including personal attacks".

Blocking administrator: LessHeard vanU (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: It's rather odd two accounts would "magically" appear right after Nricardo is blocked and get autoblocked. You are now blocked as a sock puppet. — Kwsn (Ni!) 15:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. This is now getting silly. How do I get this thing lifted?

Also. Not sock. Meat. Will delete and start anew.

I am trying to delete because I am linked to my old office mate. Not a true sockpuppet. But still bad account. Would like to start over some day.

Sorry, we don't delete talk pages except in exceptional circumstances. If you'd like to start over in the future, just register a new account. henrik•talk 17:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neutralityman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sock puppet. kswn thinks i am a sock of kswn. i am not. i used to work next to mlhwitz, and could have been considered a meat puppet of her. but not a sock of nricardo. he just works at a company with the same IP. this should all be obvious by now. anyway, why not just delete this user? i'll start another. or unban this one. otherwise, what is the point in this account?

Decline reason:

Duplicate request

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

-- But|seriously|folks 05:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neutralityman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Decline. You are right, no point to this account . — Sandahl 04:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.