User talk:Neurotm

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Neurotm, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Munda people have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 08:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You're editing disruptively on Munda people, and have ignored the copyright warning above. I have blocked you for 48 hours. Please use the time read William's warning carefully to see how to avoid copyright violations when you copy within Wikipedia (from Munda languages, in this case) when you return. Also, please note it's often inappropriate to paste a chunk of text from another article. That was the case with your additions to Munda people. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 13:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Always cite reliable published sources

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Munda people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racial discrimination on color of Munda tribe

Don't add photos which shows racial discrimination on the basis of colour... Neurotm (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove sourced content without adequate explanation

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Munda people.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Munda people editing dispute

I amnot disrupting Munda people article,some other Wikipedia editor disrupting it and I am also agree to settle the dispute on talkpage...I am providing evidence as well for my editing. Neurotm (talk) 09:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]