User talk:Neuroscientist1

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

I have potential conflicts of interest due to the following:

(1) classified and unclassified contracts, intelligence relationships, financial and other involvement with the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), US Navy, US Army, and the national governments, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement agencies of Australia, China, Egypt, India, Israel, Korea, New Zealand, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, the former Soviet Union, Turkey, Ukraine, and United Arab Emirates;

(2) business and financial dealings with Battelle, Booz Allen Hamilton, Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories Inc., Brain Fingerprinting LLC, Grass Instruments, Kantar Millward Brown, NCTU, Prime Technologies, SAIC, Semaat Security Consulting Center, Westinghouse, WPP, and other companies involved in brain fingerprinting worldwide (too many to list);

(3) relationships with Harvard University, Harvard College, Harvard Medical School, the University of Illinois, and the University of Washington;

(4) authorship of the “Brain fingerprinting: detection of concealed information” article in the Encyclopedia of Forensic Science (Wiley) and the “Lie detection” article in the Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (Elsevier) and numerous peer-reviewed articles on brain fingerprinting in scientific journals;

(5) inventing and patenting brain fingerprinting;

(6) applying brain fingerprinting in criminal and counterterrorism cases;

(7) testifying as an expert witness in court on brain fingerprinting; and

(8) Numerous interviews and appearances as an expert on brain fingerprinting in national and international news sources, e.g., TIME, US News and World Report, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CBS News, ABC World News, The Discovery Channel, The Science Channel, PBS, BBC, "Making a Murderer, Part 2" on Netflix, and many others. Neuroscientist1 (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Guy for bringing the need for these disclosures to my attention.

Please note: I am not an impartial source regarding brain fingerprinting, and obviously this must be taken into consideration in evaluating anything I write here. Nevertheless, my peer-reviewed publications and professional encyclopedia contributions are not mine alone. They are universally recognized in the scientific community as collaborative scientific contributions. They have been subject to the peer-review process and the scrutiny and contributions of the editors and reviewers as well as my coauthors. The journals and encyclopedias stand by these collaborative contributions. My peer-reviewed papers and professional encyclopedia entries have received thousands of citations in the scientific literature -- in one case over 1,000 citations of a single article. They are appropriate reference material for Wikipedia or any other source regardless of who I am personally. Neuroscientist1 (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments in the talk section of brain fingerprinting regarding needed changes in that article

Neuroscientist1 (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

You are a single-purpose account and your edits strongly suggest a conflict of interest. Our terms of use are relevant here. You should declare any material conflicts, and restrict yourself to editing the Talk pages, allowing others to review proposed edits. Guy (Help!) 01:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

When adding links to material on external sites, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 01:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I posted my second comment on brain fingerprinting with the same apparent copyright violations as the first piece before I was alerted to the issue when I read your comments that you had redacted the copyright violations in my first comment. I was away from the office and could not get back to a computer immediately to fix this. You saw this and fixed it before I could fix it. I have now gone through and replaced all of the links I could find that appear to violate copyrights (or that were redacted for that reason) with links that do not violate copyrights, when such links were available. In particular, the Wiley Encyclopedia article is publicly available in abstract form from the Encyclopedia's website. A secondary report from 'CNN' regarding the 'TIME' article is available on YouTube. I replaced several questionable links that neither you nor I had previously found. I'm acting in good faith here, but with limited knowledge about Wikipedia. Please inform me if I have made any errors or missed anything in my efforts to delete or replace any copyright violations in my comments. Neuroscientist1 (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]