User talk:Neuropsychology

Washoe

Hi, I'm having a dispute with User:McAcademic regarding the wording and the appropriate place for a statement ([1][2]) that you added. Here is his edit. Since I don't have the time for a long discussion, and I am not as competent as you to discuss the current consensus in that field of research, I think it would be better if you joined in instead. So far the discussion has been on User:McAcademic's talk page. Best, --91.148.159.4 14:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is satifactory.

Stereotype inevitability

The full citations that the Havard style referencing refer were not included when you added this article to Wikipedia. Could you check your notes and see if you can fill in the missing info? Thank you in advance for looking into this.--BirgitteSB 18:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added as many as I could remember. Neuropsychology (talk) 23:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--BirgitteSB 16:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dare Digital

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dare Digital, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Dare Digital. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Darelogo grey.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Darelogo grey.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dare (agency)

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Dare (agency), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 11:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Psychoticism

Dear "Neuropsychology"

You've made an entry om personality traits in which you've included a diagram displaying the interconnections between Psychoticism and Trhee of the big five dimension. Apparently it's from "Matthews, Deary & Whiteman, 2003" but I've been unable to locate a diagram similar to yours. I'm currently comparing Eysenck and Costa & McCrae in my thesis som I'm very interested in such diagrams. Did you make it yourself? And do your comparison of the two rely on specific source? Maybe there's a source you can recommend.

Best regards Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisvj (talk • contribs) 15:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]