User talk:Neufund
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Neufund, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Bold, Revert, Discuss
[edit]Hi, regarding [1], please take it to the article talk page and discuss, to see what other contributors think about it. But please read MOS:FORMULA ("...the community of mathematical editors of English Wikipedia currently has no consensus about preferred formatting...") and WP:CONSENSUS, in combination with WP:BRD. - DVdm (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @DVdm: Hi, too! I know but please consider the fact that there already was some math inline formatting (e. g. at the beginning) before. So I just tried to harmonize the formatting. Otherwise, one would have to remove all of the math inline formatting. So, you can go ahead if you like, but what we certainly don't want is a mishmash of both non-math and math formatting of mathematical expressions here, do we?!--Neufund (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps, yes. Let's see what other contributors say on the article talk page... - DVdm (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
AIAIAIAI: [2]. My apologies... - DVdm (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: I left a comment on the talk page. Please comment there asap. Thank you--Neufund (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
prefixes
[edit]I'm not an expert in German, and don't know of any relevant sources... AnonMoos (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Neufund. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)