User talk:NettingFish15019

Welcome!

Hi NettingFish15019! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFD nomination procedural removal

I removed the AFD nomination from Korea Passing because you will be able to do it yourself in a few days. This is purely a procedural edit, it is not a statement one way or the other on the merits of the AFD.

In the meantime, if you want someone else to start and finish the AFD on your behalf, say so on the article's talk page. Personally, I think it would be better to wait a few days until you can "do it yourself." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you recently removed content from Malaysia–South Korea relations without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 23:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Bavio the Benighted (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was it I whom you meant this for?

You addressed this to Jpgordon but it's on my page. Did you mean it in some sort of CC way? Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, that's my bad. Yes I meant to address it to you, but I got a little bit confused with the names. I've updated the question on your talk page accordingly. NettingFish15019 (talk) 03:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rising sun flag

The consensus is to keep the summary about the controversy of the flag in the lead. Whether there's counterargument or not isn't a valid reason to remove that content. Similar content has been there from day one when the article was created. STSC (talk) 17:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the discussion section. I suggest you join the discussion first before making any edit on the disputed content. STSC (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]