User talk:Nesw

Removal of episode guide

Fisrt of all, what article are we talking about?
Secondly, when posting a message on a users talk page, sign your name after it. GMc^{talk to me} 17:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to be honest, we don't need an episode guide, it doesn't contain vital information. GMc^{talk to me} 19:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Police, Camera, Action!

Thank you for your work on the article!! Since (I assume) you know something about the show, please feel free to expand the episode guide, at Police Camera Action! episode guide.

Thanks, --sunstar net^talk 13:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice UK

Hello, Nesw and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 08:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -- Smjg (talk) 02:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Golden balls

Hello, you posted on the Golden Balls page that it is returning to TV in August 2009. Can you please tell me where you sourced this information from? Nzseries1 (talk) 09:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wall Game

Hi. Thanks for updating the article. I couldn't remember whether there was a second series when I was writing it. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 17:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wheel OF fortune

Thank you for your message, The Series was NOT broadcast for a FULL 18 months period, and the series did not broadcast over 500ep during that time. I deleted the SO Called updated Transmission info, which was provide by a new user, with no ref etc. Thus the details where change back, I dont have time to give proper details for undoing trolls.

It would be helpful to users if you used more suitable and sign your post which you have been told about 6 years ago, when discussing articles.--Crazyseiko (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you are a rude person. The info was provided by myself with reference to two versions of listings, there's some gaps in transmission.I don't see why I should justify myself to your rudeness and should this continue I will have no hesitation in reporting you. User talk:Nesw

For your information the logs clearly show you did NOT entry this information, The log show the details changes come form this USERS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/94.12.118.121 Many details have been change by other people for far less details and reasons. I should also point out that listing ref on editing bar is NOT how REF works on Wikipedia.--Crazyseiko (talk) 17:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC)--Crazyseiko (talk) 17:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note you can add signature but clicking on the pencil button on the tool bar above.

The entry was made by me but I wasn't logged in.--Nesw (talk) 21:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these addition details from STV production History. Is it possible you can get more? like for show, passport quiz,etc? Crazyseiko (talk) 16:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nesw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nesw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nesw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Police Interceptors missing episode dates

I've got a list of the missing dates when Police Interceptors episodes were scheduled to premiere. Info from Trilt/BUFVC - I'll finalize the details and post them shortly.

Nesw (talk) 20:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Get Stuffed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Get Stuffed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Stuffed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]