User talk:Nestor Lozano
Unblock
[edit]
Nestor Lozano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Per @Oshwah: here - I don't understand why I have been blocked. Please provide exact links to my edits that were disruptive enough to warrant an indefinite block. Catalan (talk) 01:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I can only make assumptions since I'm not a checkuser, and I can only be to a certain level of detail in my response, since I'm obligated to protect one's privacy. But you look to have been found to be the person that was vandalizing an article, then coming back to remove it. Administrators cannot modify blocks by checkusers, but even if it wasn't placed as a checkuser block.... lol... dude just admit it... you got caught. HAHA! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock #2
[edit] | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Nestor Lozano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I initially wasn't going to appeal here a second time, but I figured I might as well give it another shot. This block undoubtedly violates the blocking policy, because I didn't do anything wrong. Quoting from WP:NICETRY: * "Understand what you did and why you have been blocked" - well, there is nothing to understand about why I have been blocked, because I didn't do anything block-worthy in the first place. * "Address the blocking administrator's concerns about your conduct (the reason given for your block)" - well, the reason for my block is highly unclear since the blocking admin didn't actually give a specific concern or reason, and therefore there's nothing I can address. Given the above two facts, I would like to be unblocked at this time. If you do not feel comfortable unblocking me, I would appreciate it greatly if you could point to specific policies that I have violated and update my block reason to reflect those violations. Catalan (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a checkuser block. Which typically means that you're blocked for sockpuppetry. Unfortunately the data regarding this is limited to a very small group, and is non-public per our privacy policy. If it were me, I would contact the arbitration committee using this page, as they are in charge of the checkusers. Please be advised that regular admins are not permitted to lift this block. SQLQuery me! 03:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As a complete aside to the above issues, please stop signing your edits as Catalan (or modify your autosignature to not do so). We already have another account (in good standing) with username Catalan, and your signature in effect causes you to impersonate that user. General Ization Talk 17:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Done Signature changed. --- Nestor Lozano (aka Catalan) 17:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you General Ization Talk 17:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
