User talk:Nero Radi

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jikaku (talk • contribs) 20:14, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reverts I made were in response to the reverts from a former web master who originally created the page. The page is now an advertisement. I suggest you remove it. It contains inaccurate information and is highly biased.

Actually, no - the former webmaster *didn't* create the page, and as for "inaccurate information" - well, it's sourced information. If you have verifiable third-party sources for new, or different information, then have at it. Jikaku (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]

I recently made changes to the article on the Union Institute and University. It had been flagged as being too advertisorial. Not being affiliated with the University in any way, but having studied it and other colleges, I added some more historical information. The information is meant to further clarify the relation between the Union Institute as a private college and the original consortium. Also, there is some confusion about the title of the doctoral degree, which I attempted to clarify.

Gary Null/July 2010

Thank you for experimenting with the page Gary Null on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Bearian (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was making a clarification regarding the title of the degree that the Union Institute is authorized to give. It is a Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Studies in Arts and Sciences. There are no other Ph.D.s in any of the arts and sciences but this general degree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nero Radi (talk • contribs) 01:35, July 30, 2010

Regarding your recent edit of the Gary Null article: It appears to me from your series of edits of the Union Institute & University article that you are, in fact, knowledgable on that subject. However, Gary Null is rather controversial, so it is very important to provide citations for info that is added to that article. If this material is added back to the article without some sort of sourcing, it is likely to be deleted once again. If you can identify the sourcing for your edit, I would be happy to assist you in formatting a proper Wiki-citation. Please reply at my talk page. Cgingold (talk) 23:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS - Always remember to sign your comments on talk pages with 4 tildes (~~~~), which automatically signs your User name along with a date stamp. Cgingold (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New changes

The article was changed and made to appear very much like an advertisement. I reverted to an earlier version that is more objective and includes a critical view. I will return to this in the future and rewrite based on additional research I have done.

Union institute

I did extensive research over a period of a year. I wrote some content. The web master for the Union Instiute is deleting my content because he or she finds that it does not promote the school. This person has a bias. They also deleted my references and now object to lack of sourcing. I will add those in, but the biased editors who are promoting the institutions and writing an advertisement will likely content to remove them.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Okay. Let me try Nero Radi (talk) 04:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]