User talk:Neozoon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neozoon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was never blocked on any project, but i Request an IP address block exemption. As commons admin (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neozoon) I need to contact users on en.wiki about their copyright violations and remove linked copyvio material links which is not possible using my "blocked" VPN connection Neozoon 12:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've run a checkuser, and as far as I can tell, your underlying IP address is not blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Neozoon discussion and talk page

Please leave new messages below the older ones: (I will answer on your talkpage) (install archive bot)

(check bot) -- Neozoon 00:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

		With thanks!
		Thanks for participating in my RfA, which closed successfuly. I leave you with a picture of the real Blood Red Sandman! Note his 'mop' is slightly deadlier than mine! - - Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ACM Multimedia

You may want to challenge my reponse to your AfD vote. I ask that you consider my argument and change your vote to merge. Robert K S 05:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CORP

Regards this edit, WP:CORP is more important for notability than 'gut' feeling. I can't read dutch, but the organization appears to be mentioned only once, just before the end of the page. Also, the writing quality, and 'usefulness' are not relevant to notability. However, if you can add more links that are relevant regards WP:CORP (pretty much the only relevant things in an AFD discussion for an organization), then the article may still pass. Remember, per WP:CORP, it must be relevant coverage in a reliable, independent, secondary source. Per WP:CORP, notability is not synonymous with 'importance'. Please review the policy and base your search for sources on that - it will save you time and effort! WLU 22:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm posting it here because it clutters up the AFD page for no real purpose - most of the people already know this so there's no point reminding them. You said:

** comment Hello WLU, thanks for your message on my discussion page. I can read dutch and I find the organization appear on all the relevant pages that deal with patient organizations and ME/CVS. I see things in a bigger context. What does Wikipedia loose when this article gets deleted? Will Wikipedia be a better place when this article about an organisation that works for raising attention to the illness of few people with little engery is deleted? The organization is mentioned in Newspaper articles, sends out press releases, has its own printed news magazin that is quoted by others. I started to edit the article and the quotations. Deleting this page just feels wrong :-) Neozoon 01:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:CORP, WP:AFD, WP:N and Wikipedia in general is not about raising awareness, being a better place or 'feeling right', it's about what is notable and encyclopedic. Many things are important, very important to some people, but not everyone gets their own page. WP:NOT deals with what should not be on wikipedia. For one thing, it is not a soapbox, irrespective of how sad or disabling a condition is; if ME/CVS Veren. is notable, as defined in our policies and to the world at large, it will get a page eventually. If it is not, it should not be on wikipedia. Further, by posting opinions on the AFD pages that are not related to policy (the reason why pages are, or are not kept), you are essentially wasting your time and wearing out your keyboard. Any dedicated contributor (like the admin who will delete or keep the page in question) will consider arguments that do not address policy to be irrelevant, and ignore them. If you truly wish the page to be kept, put your efforts into finding sources that are reliable and notable so the page passes WP:CORP. That's worth a hundred edits on the AFD page. The line 'article now passes WP:CORP because of (link)' will do far more to help the page and keep it on wikipedia than all the tugging at heartstrings in the world. I don't say this to be sarcastic or disparage your efforts or intent (I'm in a hurry so I can't really soften it up, sorry!) just to point you in the direction of most efficient efforts. Wikipedia and AFD are not about voting, so always refer to policy. Just my advice, take it for what it's worth (could be nothing :) WLU 01:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on your talkpage Neozoon 22:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:AFD

I was unfamiliar and didn't know about the person that the article was about, the lack of references made me think it was non-notable. It was my mistake and poor judgment for putting that on AfD. Sorry. Marlith ^T/C 23:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ME/CVS Vereniging

Thanks for your help. Unfortunately, the article was still deleted. I have requested undeletion here. Regards, Guido den Broeder 13:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radlands - Antwort

Kein Problem! Meine Meinung ist dass es sehr wichtig ist, beachtenswerte Artikel zu bewahren. ( sorry for my grammar, I'm still only a beginner :) ). EJF (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the day

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 0a9f84e0584526c79cd43c3831b8bb90

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

OTRS processes on En Wiki

Hi, fellow OTRS volunteer. :) A contributor had asked me to take a look at the situation with Laura Alonso; by the time I arrived, you had already processed the permission. I just wanted to talk to you about some of the OTRS procedures on this particular project. We have specific templates to use to note permission. For images, we use Template:PermissionOTRS. For articles, we use Template:ConfirmationOTRS. Since images can really only be taken from one place, the PermissionOTRS template is not specific enough for articles, which can be copied from multiple sources. Sometimes contributors copy content into articles from other sources, and we don't want to inadvertently mislead others into thinking those secondary copies are permitted. It also has a parameter for license that is essential when (unlike in this case) content is released only under CC-By-SA. Anyway, I went ahead and added the template to the article, but I wanted to point it out to you in case you log future permissions on Enwiki. :)

By the way, I'm impressed with the speed of you resolution of that ticket. We usually take at least a few days to get through items in the English queue! --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moonriddengirl, thanks a lot for your message. I was just in discussion with my fellow OTRS team in Germany on how to use en templates for OTRS and was on my way to read me through. Since it is rather complex i just droped the ticketnumber and wanted to fix the template stuff later (same for the spanish wikipedia).

The link is exactly what I was just reading at the moment. Best regards Neozoon 13:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Alonso (soprano)

Hi. About the article es:Laura Alonso (soprano), it has a "publicity" add. The fact that is has a permission is not related with notability or publicity. The text is under discussion for not to be "neutral", it has opinion and other concerns that may think in a self-promotion. It is very likely this problem born because it is a copy of the website of the singer, wich is not wrong for his original purpose, but not agree our policies ´cause it was not developed for an encyclopedy. Cheers. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andreateletrabajo, articles in Wikipedia are not static, you can edit the article to fix the issue yourself. It has been done for the german version too. Only the relevant information for the enzyclopedia has been kept and it is a pretty good article (see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Alonso_Padin )

Best regards --Neozoon 21:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Oliver Mark, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Cartier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irakly Shanidze

Please see these questions of mine about the construction of the article Irakly Shanidze, and answer there. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hoary, I did that --Neozoon 00:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, you didn't. Instead, you added no new information. Please answer the simple questions there. -- Hoary (talk) 01:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Neozoon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Kim Wall (journalist)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Kim Wall (journalist)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 21:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Neozoon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

 [[User:Neozoon|Neozoon]] : Neozoon

to

 [[User:Neozoon|Neozoon]] : Neozoon

—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

done, thanks for highligthing this. Groetjes -- Neozoon 18:52, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neozoon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]