User talk:Neozoen
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Neozoen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
List of suicides
[edit]Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to List of suicides, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, and this includes list articles, especially ones containing sensitive material like List of suicides. A discussion on this matter was held on that article's talk page years ago in which this was decided. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Please stop adding unsupported material to the List of suicide article, as you did with this edit. The source you cited makes no mention of suicide, or any determined cause of death. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 23:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for your response. I believe the markup to use when you want to compose a response on your own talk page, but have it alert the person you're speaking to is to place {{ping|OTHERUSERSNAME}} at the beginning of your message (without the "nowiki" markup of course, and replacing "OTHERUSERSNAME" with the username of the person you want alerted).
- Thanks for double-checking your source. I read that source beginning to end when reviewing the edits made to the article. Obviously, the quotes you provided do not make it clear that his suicide was determined to be suicide by a medical examiner or other authorities. They appear to be derived from the desire of the writer of the author to create a narrative, but that doesn't mean that the cause of death is clearly given in the article. At best, this is all speculation as to what he intended (the passage "Bergmann had found the place where he wanted to die", for example, presumes that the writer knew what Bergman "wanted", when he doesn't, any more than you and I do), and in any event, it doesn't mean that this is what actually happened.
- Nonetheless, I appreciate the difficulty in finding sources that clarify such things. If a reliable source becomes available on what the authorities determined his cause of death to be, I favor adding it to the Peter Bergman case article, and the list article. Thanks again, and Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Nightscream: Nice! Good to know, thanks. :)
- Fair enough: Your arguments about the inference of intend by the writer and wanting a more reliable source makes sense.
- Happy editing and Happy Holidays! Neozoen (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi again. Thanks again for all the hard work you've done expanding the article.
- One thing: Can you double-check the citation you included for Lucius Antistius Vetus? When I followed it, it lead to an error page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Nightscream: Hi again,
I get an error page as well on Tacitus XVI.10, but not on XVI.11 (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0078%3Abook%3D16%3Achapter%3D11) or XVI.9 (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0078%3Abook%3D16%3Achapter%3D9). Extremely weird. I also discovered a mistake I made: It should've been XVI.10-11, not just XVI.10. Because in XVI.10 Vetus' cause of death isn't mentioned and in XVI.11 Tacitus only refers to Vetus as "he" and "him".
I fixed my mistake and used another link for the Annals. Thanks for noticing/rechecking.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Neozoen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Neozoen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of suicides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Satanta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for July 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of assassinations in Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Su.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)